切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 147 -148. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2022.03.001

述评

颅内动脉瘤治疗现状与思考
李良1,()   
  1. 1. 100034 北京大学第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-23 出版日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 李良

Current situation and thinking of treating intracranial aneurysms

Liang Li1()   

  • Received:2022-05-23 Published:2022-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Liang Li
引用本文:

李良. 颅内动脉瘤治疗现状与思考[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 147-148.

Liang Li. Current situation and thinking of treating intracranial aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 147-148.

1
Salem M, Gross BA, Du R, et al. Cerebrovascular neurosurgery 2014 [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2015, 22(5): 775-778.
2
Cohen-Gadol AA. Tackling technical challenges for microsurgical clip ligation of complex aneurysms during the endovascular era: a personal perspective [J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 61 Suppl 1: 43-53.
3
Davies JM, Lawton MT. Advances in open microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 74 Suppl 1: S7-S16.
4
Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Dion J, et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience [J]. J Neurosurg, 1991, 75(1): 8-14.
5
Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) [J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9969): 691-697.
6
Krag CH, Speiser L, Dalby RB. Long-term outcomes of endovascular simple coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2021, 422: 117338.
7
Kaneko N, Tateshima S. [Future of Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment] [J]. No Shinkei Geka, 2021, 49(1): 164-169.
8
Lai LT, O'Neill AH. History, evolution, and continuing innovations of intracranial aneurysm surgery [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 102: 673-681.
9
Bekelis K, Gottlieb D, Labropoulos N, et al. The impact of hybrid neurosurgeons on the outcomes of endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms [J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 126(1): 29-35.
10
Luther E, McCarthy DJ, Brunet MC, et al. Treatment and diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms in the post-international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) era: trends and outcomes [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2020, 12(7): 682-687.
11
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2002, 360(9342): 1267-1274.
12
van Donkelaar CE, Bakker NA, Birks J, et al. Impact of treatment delay on outcome in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial [J]. Stroke, 2020, 51(5): 1600-1603.
13
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion [J]. Lancet, 2005, 366(9488): 809-817.
14
Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, et al. The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial: 6-year results [J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 123(3): 609-617.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要