切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 334 -341. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9248.2026.03.014

综述

人工智能在心脑血管内介入诊疗中的应用进展——从单一影像模式到多模态影像融合
徐林, 简讯, 刘道权, 易东, 鄢华()   
  1. 430022 湖北武汉,武汉亚洲心脏病医院心血管内科
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-14 出版日期:2026-06-01
  • 通信作者: 鄢华
  • 基金资助:
    武汉市医学科学研究项目(WX23JO2)

Application progress of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular interventional diagnosis and treatment–from single imaging modality to multimodal imaging fusion

Lin Xu, Xun Jian, Daoquan Liu, Dong Yi, Hua Yan()   

  1. Department of Cardiology, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
  • Received:2026-02-14 Published:2026-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Hua Yan
引用本文:

徐林, 简讯, 刘道权, 易东, 鄢华. 人工智能在心脑血管内介入诊疗中的应用进展——从单一影像模式到多模态影像融合[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 334-341.

Lin Xu, Xun Jian, Daoquan Liu, Dong Yi, Hua Yan. Application progress of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular interventional diagnosis and treatment–from single imaging modality to multimodal imaging fusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 334-341.

心脑血管疾病是严重威胁人类健康的疾病之一。血管内介入治疗术是心脑血管疾病治疗的重要手段。近年来,随着人工智能(AI)的兴起并逐渐应用于医学领域,特别是深度学习的临床应用快速发展,为心脑血管介入诊疗路径的创新优化提供了重要契机。AI技术为心脑血管内介入治疗带来了技术变革与创新范式,正重塑着心脑血管疾病诊疗的现有格局与未来发展路径。本文综述了AI技术在医学领域的发展现状及其在心脑血管介入诊疗的最新应用进展。

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are a serious threat to human health. Endovascular interventional therapy is an important means for treating these diseases. In recent years, the emergence and application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the medical field, particularly the rapid development of the clinical application of deep learning, have provided significant opportunities for the innovation and optimization of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular interventional diagnosis and treatment pathways. AI innovation brings a technological revolution and innovative paradigms, reshaping the current landscape and future development paths of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease diagnosis and treatment. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of AI technology in the medical field and its latest applications in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular interventional diagnosis and treatment.

图1 人工智能驱动的多模态影像融合系统在心脑血管内介入治疗术的应用流程图 注:CCTA为冠状动脉CT血管成像;DSA为数字减影血管造影;CTA为CT血管成像;IVUS为血管内超声;OCT为光学相干断层成像
1
Rajpurkar P, Lungren MP. The current and future state of AI interpretation of medical images [J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(21): 1981-1990.
2
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning [J]. Nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436-444.
3
Zreik M, van Hamersvelt RW, Wolterink JM, et al. A recurrent CNN for automatic detection and classification of coronary artery plaque and stenosis in coronary CT angiography [J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2018, 38(7): 1588-1598.
4
Nzeako TR, Elendu C, Echefu G, et al. Artificial intelligence in interventional cardiology: a review of its role in diagnosis, decision-making, and procedural precision [J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2025, 87(9): 5720-5734.
5
Johnson KW, Torres Soto J, Glicksberg BS, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 71(23): 2668-2679.
6
Shameer K, Johnson KW, Glicksberg BS, et al. Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? [J]. Heart, 2018, 104(14): 1156-1164.
7
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition [C]// 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas (USA): IEEE Computer Society, Computer Vision Foundation, 2016: 770-778.
8
Liu X, Zhou T, Lu M, et al. Deep learning for ultrasound localization microscopy [J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2020, 39(10): 3064-3078.
9
Khan RF, Lee BD, Lee MS. Transformers in medical image segmentation:a narrative review [J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2023, 13(12): 8747.
10
Christiansen F, Konuk E, Ganeshan AR, et al. International multicenter validation of AI-driven ultrasound detection of ovarian cancer [J]. Nature Med, 2025, 31(1): 189-196.
11
Kim HE, Cosa-Linan A, Santhanam N, et al. Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review [J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2022, 22(1): 69.
12
Langlais EL, Theriault-Lauzier P, et al. Novel artificial intelligence applications in cardiology:current landscape,limitations,and the road to real-world applications [J]. J Cardiovasc Transl Res, 2023, 16(3): 513-525.
13
Shanthi KJ, Kumar MS. Skull stripping and automatic segmentation of brain MRI using seed growth and threshold techniques [C]// 2007 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems. Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2007: 422-426.
14
Bojsen JA, Elhakim MT, Graumann O, et al. Artificial intelligence for MRI stroke detection: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Insights Imaging, 2024, 15(1): 160.
15
Jiang J, Rangnekar A, Veeraraghavan H. Self‐supervised learning improves robustness of deep learning lung tumor segmentation models to CT imaging differences [J]. Med Phys, 2025, 52(3): 1573-1588.
16
Robertshaw H, Karstensen L, Jackson B, et al. Artificial intelligence in the autonomous navigation of endovascular interventions: a systematic review [J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2023, 17: 1239374.
17
Zhao H, Xu Z, Chen L, et al. Large-scale pretrained frame generative model enables real-time low-dose DSA imaging: an AI system development and multi-center validation study [J]. Med, 2025, 6(1): 100497.
18
Zhao H, Bai Y, Chen L, et al. Generative AI-based low-dose digital subtraction angiography for intra-operative radiation dose reduction: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Nat Med, 2026, 32(1): 288-296.
19
张邢炜, 董鹏, 张治国, 等. 数字减影血管造影智能全流程剂量控制系统 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志(网络版), 2022, 5(1): 265-269.
20
Dash D, Dash U, Abu-Dakka B. Artificial intelligence-driven techniques for interventional cardiology: a current appraisal [J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2025, 81: 154-163.
21
Göçer H, Durukan AB. The use of artificial intelligence in interventional cardiology [J]. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg, 2023, 31(3): 420-421.
22
Kim Y, Yoon HJ, Suh J, et al. Artificial intelligence-based fully automated quantitative coronary angiography vs optical coherence tomography-guided PCI: the FLASH trial [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2025, 18(2): 187-197.
23
Wulamu A, Luo J, Chen S, et al. CASMatching strategy for automated detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis based on digital subtraction angiography [J]. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2024, 243: 107871.
24
Su R, Cornelissen SAP, van der Sluijs M, et al. AutoTICI: automatic brain tissue reperfusion scoring on 2D DSA images of acute ischemic stroke patients [J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2021, 40(9): 2380-2391.
25
Su R, van der Sluijs M, Cornelissen SAP, et al. Spatiotemporal deep learning for automatic detection of intracranial vessel perforation in digital subtraction angiography during endovascular thrombectomy [J]. Med Image Anal, 2022, 77: 102377.
26
Li M, Ling R, Yu L, et al. Deep learning segmentation and reconstruction for CT of chronic total coronary occlusion [J]. Radiology, 2022, 306(3): e221393.
27
Zhou Z, Gao Y, Zhang W, et al. Deep learning-based prediction of percutaneous recanalization in chronic total occlusion using coronary CT angiography [J]. Radiology, 2023, 309(2): e231149.
28
Weng T, Gan Q, Li Z, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CCTA-derived versus angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (CAREER) study: a prospective study protocol [J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(6): e055481.
29
Alnasser TN, Abdulaal L, Maiter A, et al. Advancements in cardiac structures segmentation:a comprehensive systematic review of deep learning in CT imaging [J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2024, 11: 1323461.
30
Wasserthal J, Breit HC, Meyer MT, et al. TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images [J]. Radiol Artif Intell, 2023, 5(5): e230024.
31
Wang M, Niu G, Chen Y, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning-based fully automated algorithm for pre-TAVR CT assessment of the aortic valvular complex and detection of anatomical risk factors:a retrospective,multicentre study [J]. EBioMedicine, 2023, 96: 104794.
32
West HW, Siddique M, Williams MC, et al. Deep-learning for epicardial adipose tissue assessment with computed tomography: implications for cardiovascular risk prediction [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2023, 16(6): 800-816.
33
Oikonomou EK, Antonopoulos AS, Schottlander D, et al. Standardized measurement of coronary inflammation using cardiovascular computed tomography:integration in clinical care as a prognostic medical device [J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2021, 117(13): 2677-2690.
34
林一鑫, 董晶, 贾建文, 等. 基于人工智能分析颈内动脉颅外段迂曲特征及对称性的应用性评价 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(3): 202-209.
35
Klimont M, Oronowicz-Jaskowiak A, Flieger M, et al. Deep learning for cerebral angiography segmentation from non-contrast computed tomography [J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7): e237092.
36
Fu F, Wei J, Zhang M, et al. Rapid vessel segmentation and reconstruction of head and neck angiograms using 3D convolutional neural network [J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 4829.
37
Park A, Chute C, Rajpurkar P, et al. Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms using the HeadXNet model [J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2019, 2(6): e195600.
38
Shi Z, Miao C, Schoepf UJ, et al. A clinically applicable deeplearning model for detecting intracranial aneurysm in computed tomography angiography images [J]. Nat Comm, 2020, 11(1): 6090.
39
Ueda D, Yamamoto A, Nishimori M, et al. Deep learning for MR angiography: automated detection of cerebral aneurysms [J]. Radiology, 2019, 290(1): 187-194.
40
Lee HS, Lee JM, Nam CW, et al. Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries [J]. Cardiol J, 2019, 26(3): 215-225.
41
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization [J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2): 87-165.
42
Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI [J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(19): 1813-1823.
43
Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9(19): 2024-2035.
44
Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes: developed by the task force for the management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2024, 45(36): 3415-3537.
45
Hu X, Zhang J, Yang S, et al. Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve versus intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease (FLAVOUR Ⅱ): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial [J]. Lancet, 2025, 405(10488): 1491-1504.
46
Xu B, Tu S, Song L, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR Ⅲ China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10317): 2149-2159.
47
张洪亮, 丁代欣, 杨波涛, 等. 基于人工智能的冠状动脉造影自动评估血流储备及不同血管扩张剂对其影响 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2025, 53(5): 497-504.
48
张启贤, 高松原, 方舒, 等. 基于冠状动脉造影的微循环阻力指数对冠心病患者PCI术后的预后价值 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2025, 53(5): 505-513.
49
Wang Z, Kedhi E, Liu X, et al. Prognostic implications of angiographically derived coronary radial wall strain in diabetic patients and non-flow-limiting stenosis [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2025, 18(10): 1232-1242.
50
Liebeskind DS, Feldmann E. Fractional flow in cerebrovascular disorders [J]. Interv Neurol, 2013, 1(2): 87-99.
51
Han YF, Liu WH, Chen XL, et al. Severity assessment of intracranial large artery stenosis by pressure gradient measurements: a feasibility study [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 88(2): 255-261.
52
Miao Z, Liebeskind DS, Lo W, et al. Fractional flow assessment for the evaluation of intracranial atherosclerosis: a feasibility study [J]. Interv Neurol, 2016, 5(1-2): 65-75.
53
Huang KM, Yao WH, Du J, et al. Functional assessment of cerebral artery stenosis by angiography-based quantitative flow ratio: a pilot study [J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2022, 14: 813648.
54
Yang PF, Wan S, Wang J, et al. Hemodynamic assessment for intracranial atherosclerosis from angiographic images: a clinical validation study [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2024, 16(2): 204-208.
55
Suo ST, Zhao ZC, Zhao HL, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics in symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis measured by angiography-based quantitative flow ratio: association with CT perfusion [J]. Eur Radiol, 2023, 33(8): 5687-5697.
56
Bajaj R, Huang X, Kilic Y, et al. Advanced deep learning methodology for accurate, real-time segmentation of high-resolution intravascular ultrasound images [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2021, 339: 185-191.
57
Shinohara H, Kodera S, Ninomiya K, et al. Automatic detection of vessel structure by deep learning using intravascular ultrasound images of the coronary arteries [J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(8): e0255577.
58
Chen T, Yu H, Jia H, et al. Automatic assessment of calcified plaque and nodule by optical coherence tomography adopting deep learning model [J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2022, 38(11): 2501-2510.
59
Sibbald M, Mitchell HR, Buccola J, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence-enhanced optical coherence tomography software on percutaneous coronary intervention decisions [J]. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv, 2025, 4(3): 102438.
60
邢磊, 候静波. OCT­IVUS一体成像的多模态血管腔内成像技术的应用与进展 [J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2021, 49(2): 115-120.
61
Jia H, Zhao C, Yu H, et al. Clinical performance of a novel hybrid IVUS-OCT system: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial (PANOVISION) [J]. EuroIntervention, 2023, 19(4): e318-e320.
62
Jin Q, Fu Z, Wang Y, et al. A multicenter feasibility and safety study of a novel hybrid IVUS-OCT imaging system [J]. JACC Asia, 2025, 5(3 Part 1): 396-400.
63
Xenogiannis I, Jaffer F, Shah A, et al. Computed tomography angiography co-registration with real-time fluoroscopy in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: CTA/fluoroscopy co-registration in CTO PCI [J]. EuroIntervention, 2021, 17(5): e433.
64
Tu S. Using artificial intelligence-assisted technologies to plan revascularisation: from invasive imaging to computed tomography [C]// 2025 European Society of Cardiology Congress. Madrid (Spain): European Society of Cardiology, 2025 [2025-08-29].
65
Guan M, Lin JX, Huang SM, et al. High-degree middle cerebral artery stenosis : can advanced 3D DSA-MRI fusion imaging better illustrate plaques and perforators? [J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2021, 31(1): 51-59.
66
Zhang Q, Sun Q, Zhang YQ, et al. Three-dimensional image fusion of CTA and angiography for real-time guidance during neurointerventional procedures [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2017, 9(3): 302-306.
67
Zhang CY, Liu JX, Bian LS, et al. FMB: dual-view fusion and registration of 2D DSA images and 3D MRA images for neurointerventional-based procedures [J]. Comput Biol Med, 2024, 171: 107987.
68
Zhou S, Gao Y, Li R, et al. Neurosurgical robots in China: state of the art and future prospect [J]. iScience, 2023, 26(11): 107983.
69
罗峥, 张蔚, 徐晓云, 等. 65岁以上心脑血管疾病共存病例诊治分析 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(3): 207-213.
[1] 程妹, 金亚彬, 马丁瑞, 程昊, 詹玉莲, 周丹. 基于深度学习的MRI图像分析在乳腺癌诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 169-173.
[2] 冼明桦, 刘华章, 欧阳兰飞, 谢珍艳, 钟国庆, 林金鹏, 黄星, 黄帅, 谢可乐, 曾东禹, 黄文汉, 李丽萍, 王旭平, 梁会营, 张余. 6自由度步态床旁预测老年患者跌倒风险的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 194-205.
[3] 黄楚曦, 吴卓. 人工智能在膀胱癌影像中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 241-247.
[4] 石亚超, 魏六木, 东小鸽, 樊海宁, 侯立朝, 杜凯豪, 汪占金, 薛伟伟, 刘海刚, 王展. 肝癌多模式诊断研究进展与展望[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 326-336.
[5] 邓玉飞, 王志鑫, 娄珂, 张林轩, 马桂春, 港措. 影像组学在肝癌精准诊断、疗效评估及治疗方案决策优化中应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 172-180.
[6] 杨春元, 邓旭, 王晶晶, 阳丹才让, 潘伟. 精准肝切除术技术进展与临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 261-265.
[7] 张忠, 王喆, 黄其日麦拉图, 齐岩松. 人工智能在肘关节骨关节炎诊疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 109-114.
[8] 崔妍, 祖盼云, 宋宇, 谢克亮. 基于人工智能的线上案例平台在研究生重症医学教学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 172-179.
[9] 钱涛. 融合与重塑:神经调控康复一体化范式的构建与展望[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 65-70.
[10] 张敏洁, 刘艳龙. 多模态影像学检查技术与AI放射组学在诊断输尿管肿瘤中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 133-137.
[11] 余绍斌, 康明强. ⅠA3期非小细胞肺癌预后差异及治疗策略研究进展[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 132-139.
[12] 梁怡凡, 牟婧宇, 吴雅婷, 邳靖陶, 陈乐, 武剑. 不同人工智能模型预测脑卒中不良预后诊断效能的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 308-319.
[13] 张思远, 宋晓微, 王丽君, 范玉华, 武剑. 人工智能赋能脑小血管病的血流动力学评估:研究进展与临床转化[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 327-333.
[14] 刘诗馨, 宋晓微, 武剑. 临床视角下人工智能赋能脑卒中康复的范式重塑[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 231-239.
[15] 孙庆利, 叶珊, 樊东升, 傅瑜. 人工智能在医工结合专业人才培养中的作用及其在医学教育中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 204-208.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?