切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 115 -117. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2021.02.010

所属专题: 文献

综述

超声评价颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的研究进展
赵朵1, 马惠德2, 王淑敏2,()   
  1. 1. 010110 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学
    2. 017000 内蒙古鄂尔多斯,鄂尔多斯市中心医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-19 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王淑敏
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81771842); 国家重点研发计划数字诊疗装备研发重点专项(2016YFC0104700)

Advances in ultrasound characteristics of carotid plaque

Duo Zhao1, Huide Ma2, Shumin Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Ordos Central Hospital, Inner Mongolia, Ordos 017000, China
  • Received:2020-11-19 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Shumin Wang
引用本文:

赵朵, 马惠德, 王淑敏. 超声评价颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 115-117.

Duo Zhao, Huide Ma, Shumin Wang. Advances in ultrasound characteristics of carotid plaque[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 115-117.

超声对颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的评价具有重要意义,在颈动脉斑块规范化管理中起到重要作用。本文对临床实际操作过程中关注的斑块表面形态特征、斑块回声、斑块内新生血管、斑块内炎症4个方面进行论述。提出这4个方面目前存在的问题及一些解决思路。超声对颈动脉斑块评价具有独特优势,规范检查,统一术语进行评价对于斑块的管理至关重要,因此,流程化、标准化超声评估是未来临床实践过程中更应关注的热点。

Ultrasound is of great significance in the evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. It plays an important role in the standard management of carotid plaque. In the present article, plaque surface morphology, plaque echo, plaque neovascularization and plaque inflammation were discussed in clinical practice. The existing problems in these aspects were summarized and possible solutions were suggested . Ultrasound has unique advantages in carotid plaque evaluation. Standard examination and evaluation with uniform terminology are very important for plaque management. Therefore, process-based and standardized ultrasound assessment is a hot topic in clinical practice.

1
Roth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, et al. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(14): 1333-1341.
2
Krishnamurthi RV, Ikeda T, Feigin VL. Global, regional and country-specific burden of ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2017 [J]. Neuroepidemiology, 2020, 54(2): 171-179.
3
Umemura A, Yamada K. B-mode flow imaging of the carotid artery [J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(9): 2055-2057.
4
Wang Q, Meng Y, Cao W, et al. Association of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [J]. Biomark Med, 2018, 12(4): 359-364.
5
Li X, Ma X, Lin J, et al. Severe carotid artery stenosis evaluated by ultrasound is associated with post stroke vascular cognitive impairment [J]. Brain Behav, 2017, 7(1): e00606.
6
Saba L, Caddeo G, Sanfilippo R, et al. CT and ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row CT angiography [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2007, 28(6): 1061-1066.
7
Rafailidis V, Chryssogonidis I, Tegos T, et al. Imaging of the ulcerated carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a review of the literature [J]. Insights Imaging, 2017, 8(2): 213-225.
8
Eyding J, Geier B, Staub D. Current strategies and possible perspectives of ultrasonic risk stratification of ischemic stroke in internal carotid artery disease [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2011, 32(3): 267-273.
9
Weert T, Cretier S, Groen HC, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque surface morphology in the carotid bifurcation assessed with multidetector computed tomography angiography [J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(4): 1334-1340.
10
Bray JMD, Baud JM, Dauzat M. Consensus concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques [J]. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 1997, 7(5): 289-296.
11
Muraki M, Mikami T, Yoshimoto T, et al. New criteria for the sonographic diagnosis of a plaque ulcer in the extracranial carotid artery [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 198(5): 1161-1166.
12
ten Kate GL, van Dijk AC, van den Oord SC, et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detection of carotid plaque ulceration in patients with symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2013, 112(2): 292-298.
13
Mathiesen EB, Bønaa KH, Joakimsen O. Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the tromsø study [J]. Circulation, 2001, 103(17): 2171-2175.
14
Polak JF, Shemanski L, O'Leary DH, et al. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study [J]. Radiology, 1998, 208(3): 649-654.
15
Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau WJ, et al. Diagnostic ultrasound [M]. Elsevier St. Louis, 2011: 969-970.
16
Bluth EI, Kay D, Merritt CR, et al.Sonographic characterization of carotid plaque: detection of hemorrhage [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1986, 146(5): 1061-1065.
17
Barnett HJ, Eliasziw M, Meldrum H. Plaque morphology as a risk factor for stroke [J]. JAMA, 2000, 284(2): 177.
18
Sluimer JC, Daemen MJ. Novel concepts in atherogenesis: angiogenesis and hypoxia in atherosclerosis [J]. J Pathol, 2009, 218(1): 7-29.
19
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I [J]. Circulation, 2003, 108(14): 1664-1672.
20
Staub D, Patel MB, Tibrewala A, et al. Vasa vasorum and plaque neovascularization on contrast-enhanced carotid ultrasound imaging correlates with cardiovascular disease and past cardiovascular events [J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(1): 41-47.
21
Huang R, Abdelmoneim SS, Ball CA, et al. Detection of carotid atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization using contrast enhanced ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2016, 29(6): 491-502.
22
Christopher K, Glass Joseph LW. Atherosclerosis: the road ahead [J]. Cell, 2001, 104(4): 503-516.
23
Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, et al. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47(8): C13-C18.
24
Owen D, Shalhoub J, Miller S. Inflammation within carotid atherosclerotic plaque: assessment with late-phase contrast-enhanced US [J]. Radiology, 2010, 255(2): 638-644.
25
Lindner JR, Dayton PA, Coggins MP, et al. Noninvasive imaging of inflammation by ultrasound detection of phagocytosed microbubbles [J]. Circulation, 2000, 102(5): 531-538.
26
Zhao R, Jiang J, Li H, et al. Phosphatidylserine-microbubble targeting-activated microglia/macrophage in inflammation combined with ultrasound for breaking through the blood-brain barrier [J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2018, 15(1): 334-344.
[1] 吕琦, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 颜燕红. 颈动脉斑块易损性的超声造影评估及与缺血性卒中的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1040-1045.
[2] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[3] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[4] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[5] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[6] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[7] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[8] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[9] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[10] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[11] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[12] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[13] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[14] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[15] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
阅读次数
全文


摘要