切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 228 -231. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2021.04.006

所属专题: 指南共识

指南与规范

《2020年中国心脏骤停后脑保护专家共识》解读一:神经功能评估
杜兰芳1, 马青变1,()   
  1. 1. 100191 北京大学第三医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-01 出版日期:2021-08-09
  • 通信作者: 马青变

Interpretation of 2020 expert consensus statement on neuroprotection after cardiac arrest in China (I): neurological assessment

Lanfang Du1, Qingbian Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Emergency Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2021-05-01 Published:2021-08-09
  • Corresponding author: Qingbian Ma
引用本文:

杜兰芳, 马青变. 《2020年中国心脏骤停后脑保护专家共识》解读一:神经功能评估[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 228-231.

Lanfang Du, Qingbian Ma. Interpretation of 2020 expert consensus statement on neuroprotection after cardiac arrest in China (I): neurological assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 228-231.

对于心脏骤停患者,复苏后神经功能评估至关重要。准确的神经功能评估可以避免对于有脑复苏可能患者的过早或不恰当撤除生命支持手段而导致的不必要的死亡,也有助于早期识别无脑复苏希望的患者。我国心脏骤停后诊疗仍然存在诸多不足,如医务人员对复苏后神经功能评估的认知度低、实践情况不规范等。为了提高院前急救、急诊科以及危重症医师对于心脏骤停后神经功能评估的认知度,推进规范化神经功能评估操作流程,本文就《2020年中国心脏骤停后脑保护专家共识》中的神经功能评估部分进行解读,内容主要涉及心肺复苏后神经功能评估的手段和流程。

Neurological prognostication has become a very important part of post-cardiac arrest (CA) care. Early and accurate prediction of neurological should allows optimizing identification of those individuals with no chance of a good recovery and avoid making inappropriate decisions on withdrawal of life support in patients with the potential for recovery which is a frequent cause of death. However, there are still many challenges to address CA as an important public health issue in China, such as insufficient awareness as well as poor and non-standard practice of neurological assessment. To promote standardized neurological assessment after CA, we interpreted the part of neurological assessment in 2020 expert consensus statement on neuroprotection after cardiac arrest in China, which mainly involved the methods and protocols of neurological assessment after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

表1 心脏骤停患者心肺复苏后神经功能评估流程
1
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association [J]. Circulation, 2015, 131(4): e29-322.
2
Girotra S, Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, et al. Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest [J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(20): 1912-1920.
3
张娜, 刘纪改. 心肺复苏中溶栓对脑复苏影响的研究进展 [J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2009, 18(8): 891-892.
4
Storm C, Nee J, Sunde K, et al. A survey on general and temperature management of post cardiac arrest patients in large teaching and university hospitals in European countries--SPAME trial results [J]. Resuscitation, 2017, 116: 84-90.
5
Nolan JP, Sandroni C, Böttiger BW, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2021, 47(4): 369-421.
6
Berg KM, Cheng A, Panchal AR, et al. Part 7: Systems of Care: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care [J]. Circulation, 2020, 142(16_suppl_2): S580-S604.
7
Du L, Zheng K, Feng L, et al. The first national survey on practices of neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest in China, still a lot to do [J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2021, 75(4): e13759.
8
Ma Q, Feng L, Wang T, et al. 2020 expert consensus statement on neuro-protection after cardiac arrest in China [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(2): 175.
9
Wijdicks EFM, Hijdra A, Young GB, et al. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology [J]. Neurology, 2006, 67(2): 203-210.
10
心肺复苏后昏迷患者早期神经功能预后评估专家共识组. 心肺复苏后昏迷患者早期神经功能预后评估专家共识 [J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(2): 156-162.
11
Samaniego EA, Mlynash M, Caulfield AF, et al. Sedation confounds outcome prediction in cardiac arrest survivors treated with hypothermia [J]. Neurocrit Care, 2011, 15(1): 113-119.
12
Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR, et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care [J]. Circulation, 2010, 122(18 Suppl 3): S640-S656.
13
Zandbergen EGJ, Hijdra A, JHTM Koelman, et al. Prediction of poor outcome within the first 3 days of postanoxic coma [J]. Neurology, 2006, 66(1): 62-68.
14
Terman SW, Hume B, Meurer WJ, et al. Impact of presenting rhythm on short-and long-term neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest treated with therapeutic hypothermia [J]. Crit Care Med, 2014, 42(10): 2225-2234.
15
Stammet P, Collignon O, Hassager C, et al. Neuron-specific enolase as a predictor of death or poor neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management at 33℃ and 36℃ [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015, 65(19): 2104-2114.
16
Wang CH, Chang WT, Su KI, et al. Neuroprognostic accuracy of blood biomarkers for post-cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Resuscitation, 2020, 148: 108-117.
17
Deye N, Nguyen P, Vodovar N, et al. Protein S100B as a reliable tool for early prognostication after cardiac arrest [J]. Resuscitation, 2020, 156: 251-259.
18
Rothstein TL. SSEP retains its value as predictor of poor outcome following cardiac arrest in the era of therapeutic hypothermia [J]. Crit Care, 2019, 23(1): 327.
19
Lachance B, Wang Z, Badjatia N, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials and neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest [J]. Neurocrit Care, 2020, 32(3): 847-857.
20
Gentsch A, Storm C, Leithner C, et al. Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest: a simplified method for determination of gray-white matter ratio in cranial computed tomography [J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2015, 25(1): 49-54.
21
Hirsch KG, Fischbein N, Mlynash M, et al. Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for post-cardiac arrest coma [J]. Neurology, 2020, 94(16): e1684-e1692.
22
Velly L, Perlbarg V, Boulier T, et al. Use of brain diffusion tensor imaging for the prediction of long-term neurological outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest: a multicentre, international, prospective, observational, cohort study [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2018, 17(4): 317-326.
23
Norton L, Hutchison R, Young G, et al. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients [J]. Neurology, 2012, 78(3): 175-181.
24
Koenig MA, Holt JL, Ernst T, et al. MRI default mode network connectivity is associated with functional outcome after cardiopulmonary arrest [J]. Neurocrit Care, 2014, 20(3): 348-357.
[1] 孔莹莹, 谢璐涛, 卢晓驰, 徐杰丰, 周光居, 张茂. 丁酸钠对猪心脏骤停复苏后心脑损伤的保护作用及机制研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 355-362.
[2] 楼亨通, 陆远强. 非外伤性院外心脏骤停患者预后危险因素分析及列线图模型的构建[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 177-186.
[3] 中华医学会烧伤外科学分会小儿烧伤学组. 儿童烧伤早期休克液体复苏专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 371-376.
[4] 黄跃生. 努力建设高水平创面修复新学科[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 185-187.
[5] 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会. 老年患者皮肤撕裂伤防护专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 98-103.
[6] 倪鑫淼, 王磊, 王潇, 陈志远, 翁小东, 刘修恒. 前列腺癌患者骨保护现状及临床用药进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 191-195.
[7] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 193-199.
[8] 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识编写组. 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 630-638.
[9] 于洋, 刘孝洁, 王丽娟, 高宇晨, 丁瑶, 敖虎山. 新冠肺炎常态化条件下心肺复苏培训模式初探[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 483-486.
[10] 沈丘月, 侯新琳. n-3多不饱和脂肪酸脑保护机制研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 471-478.
[11] 杨旭希, 郑吉洋, 陈秀梅, 陈淑玲, 杨峻青, 苏芝琪, 左咏臻, 广东省医师协会心力衰竭专业医师分会, 广东省护士协会介入护士分会. 慢性心力衰竭患者容量管理护理专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 201-207.
[12] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国经口胆胰管镜超级微创诊疗技术共识意见(2023年,北京)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 217-239.
[13] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会护理协作组. 消化内镜中心的环境与布局专家共识建议(2023年,北京)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 240-247.
[14] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国结直肠息肉冷切专家共识(2023年,杭州)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 73-82.
[15] 梅冬兰, 凌受毅, 梅冰, 邵光亮, 孙志辉. 院外自动心肺复苏机序贯骨髓腔输液在抢救呼吸心跳骤停患者中的应用价值[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 159-162.
阅读次数
全文


摘要