| 1 |
Chen C, Dabhi N, Snyder MH, et al. Intrasaccular flow disruption for brain aneurysms: a systematic review of long-term outcomes [J]. J Neurosurg, 2021: 1-13. Online ahead of print.
|
| 2 |
Gawlitza M, Soize S, Manceau P, et al. An update on intrasaccular flow disruption for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms [J]. Expert Rev Med Devic, 2019, 16(3): 229-236.
|
| 3 |
王奎重, 刘卫东. 颅内动脉瘤瘤内扰流装置Woven EndoBridge的临床应用进展 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(4): 277-282.
|
| 4 |
König I, Maurer C, Berlis A, et al. Treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms with WEB 17 versus WEB 21 systems [J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2021, 31(3): 691-697.
|
| 5 |
Dmytriw AA, Diestro JDB, Dibas M, et al. International study of intracranial aneurysm treatment using Woven EndoBridge: RESULts of the WorldWideWEB consortium [J]. Stroke, 2022, 53(2): A121037609.
|
| 6 |
Adeeb N, Dibas M, Diestro JDB, et al. Multicenter study for the treatment of sidewall versus bifurcation intracranial aneurysms with use of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) [J]. Radiology, 2022, 304(2): 372-382.
|
| 7 |
Essibayi MA, Lanzino G, Brinjikji W. Safety and efficacy of the Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Am J NeuroradioL, 2021, 42(9): 1627-1632.
|
| 8 |
Girot JB, Caroff J, Cortese J, et al. Endovascular treatment of small and very small intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device [J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2021, 42(7): 1276-1281.
|
| 9 |
Algin O, Corabay S, Ayberk G. Long-term efficacy and safety of WovenEndoBridge (WEB)-assisted cerebral aneurysm embolization [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2022: 15910199211060970.
|
| 10 |
Peterson C, Cord BJ. Recurrent and residual aneurysms after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) therapy: what's next? [J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(4): e14404.
|
| 11 |
Goertz L, Liebig T, Siebert E, et al. Woven EndoBridge embolization versus microsurgical clipping for unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 2021, 88(4): 779-784.
|
| 12 |
Kabbasch C, Goertz L, Siebert E, et al. WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(8): 812-816.
|
| 13 |
Goertz L, Liebig T, Siebert E, et al. Intrasaccular flow disruption with the Woven EndoBridge for narrow-necked aneurysms: a safety and feasibility study [J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 151: e278-e285.
|
| 14 |
Goertz L, Liebig T, Siebert E, et al. Stent-assisted WEB embolization: aneurysm characteristics, outcome and case report of a WEB delivered through a stent [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2022, 164(8): 2181-2190.
|
| 15 |
Al Saiegh F, Velagapudi L, Khanna O, et al. Predictors of aneurysm occlusion following treatment with the WEB device: systematic review and case series [J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2022, 45(2): 925-936.
|
| 16 |
Cortese J, Caroff J, Chalumeau V, et al. Determinants of cerebral aneurysm occlusion after embolization with the WEB device: a single-institution series of 215 cases with angiographic follow-up [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022: neurintsurg-2022-018780.
|
| 17 |
Di Caterino F, Primikiris P, Vitale G, et al. Woven EndoBridge device immediate post-detachment tilt with later displacement: case report, rescue techniques, and review of the literature [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2020, 26(4): 483-487.
|
| 18 |
Abdelrady M, Dargazanli C, Derraz I, et al. Successful WEBectomy during embolization of temporal arteriovenous malformation-associated flow-related basilar aneurysms [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2021: 15910199211057693. Online ahead of print.
|
| 19 |
Ansari S, Zevallos CB, Farooqui M, et al. Optimal Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device size selection using automated volumetric software [J]. Brain Sciences, 2021, 11(7): 901.
|
| 20 |
Caroff J, Cortese J, Girot J, et al. Woven EndoBridge device shape modification can be mitigated with an appropriate oversizing strategy: a VasoCT based study [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(1): neurintsurg-2020-017232.
|
| 21 |
Piotin M, Biondi A, Sourour N, et al. The LUNA aneurysm embolization system for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short-term, mid-term and long-term clinical and angiographic results [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 10(12): e34.
|
| 22 |
Piotin M, Fahed R, Redjem H, et al. The ARTISSE intrasaccular device for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short-term, mid-term and long-term clinical and angiographic results [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2021: neurintsurg-2021-017806. Online ahead of print.
|
| 23 |
Aguilar Perez M, Bhogal P, Martinez Moreno R, et al. The Medina Embolic Device: early clinical experience from a single center [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 9(1): 77-87.
|
| 24 |
Bhogal P, Brouwer PA, Yeo L, et al. The medina embolic device: karolinska experience [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2018, 24(1): 4-13.
|
| 25 |
Turk AS, Maia O, Ferreira CC, et al. Periprocedural safety of aneurysm embolization with the Medina Coil System: the early human experience [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 8(2): 168-172.
|
| 26 |
Frölich AM, Nawka MT, Ernst M, et al. Intra-aneurysmal flow disruption after implantation of the Medina® Embolization Device depends on aneurysm neck coverage [J]. PloS One, 2018, 13(2): e191975.
|
| 27 |
Haffaf I, Clarençon F, Shotar E, et al. Medina embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 18 months' angiographic results [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(5): 516-522.
|
| 28 |
Liebig T, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Gal G, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the Contour neurovascular system (Contour) for the treatment of Bifurcation aneurysms: the CERUS study [J]. Neurosurgery, 2022, 90(3): 270-277.
|
| 29 |
Akhunbay-Fudge CY, Deniz K, Tyagi AK, et al. Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the novel Contour Neurovascular System: a single-center safety and feasibility study [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2020, 12(10): 987-992.
|
| 30 |
Thormann M, Mpotsaris A, Behme D. Treatment of a middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysm with the novel Contour Neurovascular System compatible with 0.021″ catheters [J]. Neuroradiol J, 2022, 35(3): 396-398.
|