切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -43. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2022.01.008

论著

直接搭桥对比联合搭桥治疗成人缺血型烟雾病的疗效
赵鹏1, 张平1, 邓林1, 吴伟2, 李新钢3, 王东海3,()   
  1. 1. 250012 济南,山东大学齐鲁医院神经外科
    2. 250012 济南,山东大学齐鲁医院神经内科
    3. 250012 济南,山东大学齐鲁医院神经外科;250012 济南,山东大学脑与类脑科学研究院
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2022-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王东海
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学齐鲁医院临床新技术资助项目(2019-7)

Effect of direct bypass and combined bypass surgery for adult ischemic Moyamoya disease

Peng Zhao1, Ping Zhang1, Lin Deng1, Wei Wu2, Xingang Li3, Donghai Wang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
    2. Department of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
    3. Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China; Institute of Brain and Brain-inspired Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 25012, China
  • Received:2021-01-11 Published:2022-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Donghai Wang
引用本文:

赵鹏, 张平, 邓林, 吴伟, 李新钢, 王东海. 直接搭桥对比联合搭桥治疗成人缺血型烟雾病的疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 38-43.

Peng Zhao, Ping Zhang, Lin Deng, Wei Wu, Xingang Li, Donghai Wang. Effect of direct bypass and combined bypass surgery for adult ischemic Moyamoya disease[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 38-43.

目的

比较直接搭桥与联合搭桥治疗成人缺血型烟雾病的疗效。

方法

分析2014年至2018年于山东大学齐鲁医院行直接或颞肌贴敷并脑膜翻转术(EDMS)法联合搭桥的成人缺血型烟雾患者204例的病历资料,包含129侧直接搭桥(颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥),113侧联合搭桥(颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥+EDMS),其中38例患者接受双侧搭桥手术。通过脑血管造影的松岛分级,Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估2组患者的手术效果,采用Logistic回归模型分析影响血管生成的因素。

结果

2组患者血管生成上各松岛分级差异无统计学意义(P=0.494)。松岛分级3级的患者中,联合搭桥组血管生成能力明显优于直接搭桥组(P=0.048)。年龄(OR=0.917,95% CI:0.888~0.945,P<0.001)和术前是否存在颅内外血管代偿(OR=2.736,95% CI:1.560~4.881,P<0.001)是影响血管生成的独立影响因素。

结论

对于成人缺血型烟雾病,联合搭桥与直接搭桥在血管生成方面无明显差别,对年轻患者或术前存在颅内外血管代偿的患者推荐采用直接搭桥。

Objective

To compare the efficacy of direct bypass and combined bypass with encephalo-duro-myo-synangiosis (EDMS) bypass in the treatment of adult ischemic Moyamoya disease.

Methods

The medical records of 204 adult patients with ischemic Moyamoya disease who underwent direct or combined bypass in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from 2014 to 2018 were analyzed. A total of 242 hemispheres were treated, which included 129 hemispheres which underwent direct bypass (superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass, STA-MCA bypass) and 113 hemispheres which underwent combined STA-MCA bypass with EDMS. Among them, 38 patients underwent bilateral bypass surgery. Through the Matsushima grading of cerebral angiography and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the surgical effect of the two groups was evaluated. The factors affecting angiogenesis were analyzed by Logistic regression model.

Results

There was no significant difference in angiogenesis between the two groups (P=0.494). As for patients with Matsushima grade 3, angiogenesis in the combined bypass group was significantly better than that in the direct bypass group (P=0.048). Age (OR=0.917, 95% CI: 0.888~0.945, P<0.001) and whether there is extracranial vascular compensation (OR=2.736,95% CI: 1.560~4.881, P<0.001) is an important factor affecting angiogenesis.

Conclusion

For adult ischemic Moyamoya disease, there is no significant difference in angiogenesis between combined bypass and direct bypass treatment. Direct bypass is recommended for young patients or patients with intracranial and extracranial vascular compensation before operation.

表1 成人缺血型烟雾病242侧手术的临床资料
表2 成人缺血型烟雾病不同组别间血管生成结果比较[侧(%)]
表3 影响成人缺血型烟雾病搭桥手术血管生成因素的单因素和多因素回归分析
图1 成人缺血型烟雾病患者术后1年Kaplan-Meier生存分析
1
Research Committee on the Pathology and Treatment of Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of Willis, Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on Measures for Infractable Diseases. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Moyamoya disease (spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis) [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2012, 52(5): 245-266.
2
Shang S, Zhou D, Ya J, et al. Progress in Moyamoya disease [J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2020, 43(2): 371-382.
3
Kim H, Jang D, Han Y, et al. Direct bypass versus indirect bypass in adult Moyamoya angiopathy with symptoms or hemodynamic instability: a meta-analysis of comparative studies [J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 94: 273-284.
4
Nielsen TH, Abhinav K, Sussman ES, et al. Direct versus indirect bypass procedure for the treatment of ischemic Moyamoya disease: results of an individualized selection strategy [J]. J Neurosurg, 2020, 134(5): 1578-1589.
5
Liu JJ, Steinberg GK. Direct versus indirect bypass for Moyamoya disease [J]. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2017, 28(3): 361-374.
6
Zhao Y, Yu S, Lu J, et al. Direct bypass surgery vs. Combined bypass surgery for hemorrhagic Moyamoya disease: a comparison of angiographic outcomes [J]. Front Neurol, 2018, 9: 1121.
7
Matsushima T, Inoue T, Suzuki SO, et al. Surgical treatment of Moyamoya disease in pediatric patients-comparison between the results of indirect and direct revascularization procedures [J]. Neurosurgery, 1992, 31(3): 401-405.
8
Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Hickman ZL, et al. Clinical features, surgical treatment, and long-term outcome in adult patients with Moyamoya disease.Clinical article. [J]. J Neurosurg, 2009, 111(5): 936-942.
9
Hallemeier CL, Rich KM, Grubb RL, et al. Clinical features and outcome in North American adults with Moyamoya phenomenon [J]. Stroke, 2006, 37(6): 1490-1496.
10
Kuroda S, Houkin K. Moyamoya disease: current concepts and future perspectives [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7(11): 1056-1066.
11
Moussouttas M, Rybinnik I. A critical appraisal of bypass surgery in Moyamoya disease [J]. Ther Adv Neurol Disord, 2020, 13: 1756286420921092.
12
Jang DK, Lee KS, Rha HK, et al. Bypass surgery versus medical treatment for symptomatic Moyamoya disease in adults [J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 127(3): 492-502.
13
Fujimura M, Tominaga T. Lessons learned from Moyamoya disease: outcome of direct/indirect revascularization surgery for 150 affected hemispheres [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2012, 52(5): 327-332.
14
Liu X, Zhang D, Shuo W, et al. Long term outcome after conservative and surgical treatment of haemorrhagic Moyamoya disease [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2013, 84(3): 258-265.
15
夏禹. 轻型缺血性卒中的研究进展 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 175-179.
16
Zhao Y, Li J, Lu J, et al. Predictors of neoangiogenesis after indirect revascularization in Moyamoya disease: a multicenter retrospective study [J]. J Neurosurg, 2019, 1: 1-11.
17
Januszewski J, Beecher JS, Chalif DJ, et al. Flow-based evaluation of cerebral revascularization using near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography [J]. Neurosurgical focus, 2014, 36(2): E14.
[1] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[2] 别瑶, 曹志斌, 辛静, 王健楠, 惠宗光. 应用基质血管成分细胞治疗糖尿病足溃疡的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 453-456.
[3] 全勇, 冉新泽, 胡梦佳, 陈芳, 陈乃成, 廖伟年, 陈默, 申明强, 陈石磊, 王崧, 王军平. 低氧习服在小鼠造血干细胞急性放射损伤修复中的作用观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 293-298.
[4] 董磊, 李修珍, 韩林孜, 杨芳. 牙髓血运重建术治疗年轻恒磨牙慢性根尖周炎的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 38-42.
[5] 汤宏涛, 何坤. 中晚期肝细胞癌介入治疗的进展及前景[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 305-308.
[6] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[7] 谭林, 蒲运刚, 朱顺, 杨希. 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血清FGF21、ANGPTL4、HO-1表达及其临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 227-229.
[8] 刘颂, 张喜成, 孙元, 黄献琛, 卢杏生. 腹腔镜治疗中弓韧带压迫综合征[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 370-375.
[9] 刘佳, 付丽, 杨月美. miR-138-5p调节HIF-1α/Notch1轴对滋养层细胞侵袭和血管生成的影响[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 277-287.
[10] 谢井伟, 王森, 王非, 郭永坤. STA-MCA血管搭桥术治疗烟雾病[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 318-320.
[11] 赖丽, 尧小龙, 李俊. 烟雾病合并血流相关性动脉瘤二例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 122-125.
[12] 谢世锋, 林熙, 吴桂涛, 刘珍银. 散发性静脉畸形发病机制分子研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 250-255.
[13] 曹磊, 邵轶普, 张志中, 王晨潮, 孙开文, 董阳, 闫东明, 李红伟, 杨波. 基于遗传基因的烟雾病与烟雾综合征生物信息学分析机制研究[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 350-356.
[14] 陆东生, 谭家亮, 孙祯卿, 付东翔, 谷宇, 徐海通. 家族性烟雾病二例报告[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 270-273.
[15] 杨海华, 袁景林, 周晓梅, 牛军伟. RNF213基因突变所致烟雾病一家系病例临床分析并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 495-498.
阅读次数
全文


摘要