切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 31 -36. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2023.01.006

临床研究

血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的疗效与影响因素分析
连万成1, 姚京2, 吴泽涛2, 何毅2, 伍健明2,(), 张猛2,()   
  1. 1. 230032 合肥,安徽医科大学深圳二院临床学院;518116 深圳大学附属华南医院神经外科
    2. 518035 深圳大学第一附属医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-26 出版日期:2023-02-01
  • 通信作者: 伍健明, 张猛
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市2020年基础研究重点项目(基2020N325)

Flow-diverters in treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a study of efficacy and influencing factors

Wancheng Lian1, Jing Yao2, Zetao Wu2, Yi He2, Jianming Wu2,(), Meng Zhang2,()   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Second People's Hospital Clinical College, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China; Department of Neurosurgery, South China Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518116, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China
  • Received:2022-07-26 Published:2023-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianming Wu, Meng Zhang
引用本文:

连万成, 姚京, 吴泽涛, 何毅, 伍健明, 张猛. 血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的疗效与影响因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 31-36.

Wancheng Lian, Jing Yao, Zetao Wu, Yi He, Jianming Wu, Meng Zhang. Flow-diverters in treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a study of efficacy and influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 31-36.

目的

探讨单纯血流导向装置或联合弹簧圈治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的短中期疗效以及影响因素。

方法

回顾性连续纳入深圳大学第一附属医院血管神经外科2019年1月至2020年12月采用Tubridge血流导向装置治疗的未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者手术数据及3~18个月随访数据。有完整随访资料者共46例(均以最后1次随访数据为准),分析病例的临床资料、手术结果(闭塞率)、动脉瘤形态学特征情况。采用单因素结合多因素非条件Logistic回归分析方法,分析动脉瘤闭塞率的影响因素。

结果

46例患者根据随访结果分为完全闭塞组(28例)与不完全闭塞组(18例)。2组患者年龄、动脉瘤类型、有无侧支方面比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。单纯使用Tubridge血流导向装置(密网支架)栓塞治疗者32例,辅助弹簧圈治疗者14例,手术成功率100%。在3~18个月术后影像学随访过程中,在完全闭塞组密网支架联合弹簧圈治疗者占12/28,而未完全闭塞组密网支架联合弹簧圈治疗者仅占2/18,2组比较差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.792,P=0.029)。进一步对照分析发现动脉瘤有无侧支发出、是否联合弹簧圈治疗、随访时间>6个月是影响动脉瘤闭塞的主要因素(OR=0.101、9.832、9.266,P=0.003、0.009、0.021)。

结论

血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤在>6个月的时间随访时有着良好的闭塞率,且联合弹簧圈辅助治疗时闭塞率更高,但动脉瘤存在侧支血管会影响其闭塞率。

Objective

To explore the short and medium-term efficacy and influencing factors of simple flow diverter stents (FD) or combined with coil embolization in treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Methods

The clinical data and 3-18 months of follow-up data of patients were collected and analyzed, who were treated with Tubridge (TB, Microport, Shanghai, CN) for intracranial aneurysm at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University from January 2019 to December 2020. The clinical data, surgical outcomes (occlusion rate), and morphological characteristics of aneurysms were analyzed. For the above data, the influencing factors of occlusion rate were analyzed by univariate combined with multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 46 cases with complete data were included in the study. According to the follow-up results, they were divided into the completed occlusion group (n=28) and the incomplete occlusion group (n=18). There were no statistically significant differences in ages of onset, aneurysm types, with or without collateral vessels (all P>0.05). Among all patients, 32 patients were embolized with blood flow guidance device alone and the other 14 patients were assisted with coil embolization. The success rate of the operation was 100%. During postoperative imaging follow-up for 3-18 months, treatment with FD combined with coil embolization accounted for 12/28 in the completed occlusion group, and accounted for 2/18 in the incomplete occlusion group, showing a significantly statistical difference (χ2=4.792, P=0.029). Further comparative analysis showed that the presence or absence of collateral branches, with or without coil embolization, and follow-up time >6 months were the major factors affecting the primary closure of aneurysms (OR=0.101, 9.832, 9.266; P=0.003, 0.009, 0.021).

Conclusion

The occlusion rate of unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with FDs was reasonable during the follow-up of more than 6 months, and the occlusion rate is higher when combined with coil embolization; however, the occlusion rate of aneurysms will be affected when there are collateral vessels.

图1 未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者单纯支架治疗造影图像。图a术前正位示右侧颈内C4段动脉瘤,大小约4 mm×3 mm,宽基底;图b为术后即刻复查,置入4.5 mm×30 mm Tubridge血流支架后见动脉瘤内造影剂滞留;图c术后8个月复查,见动脉瘤基本不显影;图d为术中置入动脉瘤支架后三维重建图
图2 未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者支架联合弹簧圈治疗图像。图a术前正位示左侧颈内动脉眼段动脉瘤约6 mm×6 mm,宽基底;图b为术后即刻复查,完全释放支架后颈内动脉通畅,动脉瘤不显影;图c为8个月后复查,见颈内动脉分支通畅,动脉瘤未显影;图d为血流导向装置1枚+弹簧圈3枚术后三维重建图
表1 未破裂的颅内动脉瘤患者不同治疗方式组间基线临床资料比较
表2 颅内动脉瘤闭塞率的单因素非条件Logistic回归分析
表3 颅内动脉瘤闭塞率的多因素Logistic回归分析
19
Etminan N, Rinkel GJ. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management [J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2016, 12(12): 699-713.
20
Jia L, Wang J, Zhang L, et al. Evaluating the Tubridge™ flow diverter for large cavernous carotid artery aneurysms [J]. Chin Neurosurg J, 2020, 6(1): 36.
1
卢旺盛, 吕明. 从过去走向未来, 颅内动脉瘤的诊治历程 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(10): 1009-1011.
2
Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms [J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(9): 928-939.
3
Frösen J, Tulamo R, Paetau A, et al. Saccular intracranial aneurysm: pathology and mechanisms [J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2012, 123(6): 773-786.
4
van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJE. Subarachnoid haemorrhage [J]. Lancet, 2007, 369(9558): 306-318.
5
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment [J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9378): 103-110.
6
郑超波, 陈林辉, 吴炯, 等. 血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂复杂动脉瘤单中心短中期疗效分析 [J]. 浙江医学, 2021, 43(2): 205-208.
7
Chancellor B, Raz E, Shapiro M, et al. Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysm treatment: trials involving flow diverters and long-term outcomes [J] Neurosurgery, 2020, 86(Suppl 1): S36-S45.
8
王驰, 刘长江, 杨鹏飞, 等. 神经外科医师对颅内动脉瘤血管内栓塞术后DSA即刻结果判读的影响 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2016, 13(1): 3-7.
9
Foutrakis GN, Yonas H, Sclabassi RJ. Saccular aneurysm formation in curved and bifurcating arteries [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1999, 20(7): 1309-1317.
10
Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, et al. Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization [J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 71(2): E509-E513, discussion E513.
11
Sprengers ME, Schaafsma J, van Rooij WJ, et al. Stability of intracranial aneurysms adequately occluded 6 months after coiling: a 3T MR angiography multicenter long-term follow-up study [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2008, 29(9): 1768-1774.
12
Narata AP, Obradó L, Moyano RK, et al. Cerebral aneurysm occlusion at 12-month follow-up after flow-diverter treatment: statistical modeling for V&V with real-world data [J]. Front Med Technol, 2021, 3: 705003.
13
Schaafsma JD, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. Long-term recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after adequate coiling versus clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(5): 1758-1763.
14
Sluzewski M, Menovsky T, van Rooij WJ, et al. Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003, 24(2): 257-262.
15
van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, Sluzewski M, et al. Intracranial aneurysms that repeatedly reopen over time after coiling: imaging characteristics and treatment outcome [J]. Neuroradiology, 2007, 49(4): 343-349.
16
Wermer MJ, Greebe P, Algra A, et al. Incidence of recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Stroke, 2005, 36(11): 2394-2399.
17
耿介文, 翟晓东, 吉喆, 等. 中国颅内未破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021 [J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(9): 634-664.
18
Yang H, Jiang H, Ni W, et al. Treatment strategy for unruptured intracranial aneurysm in elderly patients: coiling, clipping, or conservative? [J]. Cell Transplant, 2019, 28(6): 767-774.
[1] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[2] 黎鹏程, 黄谦亦, 张逵, 范润金, 尚彬. 手术切除颅内巨大假性动脉瘤一例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 123-125.
[3] 李田利, 张照龙, 孙成建, 刘国平, 谢宜兴, 赵晓龙, 邵黎明, 郑璇, 王长鑫, 徐锐. 基于血流动力学、血脂及外周血炎症标志物的眼段动脉瘤破裂风险相关研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 78-83.
[4] 刘中百, 任勇军. 肝细胞癌的介入治疗现状及进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 111-115.
[5] 李世凯, 梁佳, 何艳艳, 于毅, 李天晓, 常金龙, 贺迎坤. 兔颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄模型在介入治疗的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 357-362.
[6] 张德伟, 雷毅, 江哲宇, 王黎洲, 许国辉, 周石. 杂交手术治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并下肢急性动脉血栓一例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 380-384.
[7] 矫健, 李汶翰, 罗瀚, 袁亚君, 王文毫, 刘汉伟, 于本帅. Pipeline血流导向装置与传统支架辅助栓塞治疗颈内动脉未破裂中小型动脉瘤的疗效比较分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 223-229.
[8] 陈爱霞, 吴培, 吴桥伟, 李俞辰, 胡旭晨, 姚金彪, 陈平伯, 史怀璋, 王跃华. 单纯血流导向装置治疗椎-基底动脉动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 241-246.
[9] 陈中国, 万宇婷, 陈卓萍, 陈晓君, 袁亚君. CPR技术在颅内血流导向装置植入术中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 247-250.
[10] 林加文, 印于, 杨俊, 朱晓黎, 王万胜. 肝动门静脉瘘合并腹水一例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 289-291.
[11] 吴雅琴, 莫伟, 向华, 李琴, 李兰. 肝癌患者介入治疗穿刺处出血影响因素的真实世界研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 117-122.
[12] 阴捷, 王驰, 刘玥, 李艳华. 儿童肝脏血管瘤的介入治疗方法及疗效的初步探讨[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 6-11.
[13] 陈丹丹, 潘文志, 陈莎莎, 张源, 张晓春, 李明飞, 周达新, 葛均波. 结构性心脏病年度报告2022[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 129-140.
[14] 孙相利, 许真真. 经皮冠状动脉旋磨术在冠状动脉重度钙化病变介入治疗中的应用[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 33-36.
[15] 姜新鹏, 李晓明, 杨航, 宫一宸, 傅元豪, 傅瑜, 张喆. 单纯经胸超声心动图引导卵圆孔未闭封堵术早期安全性及有效性分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 320-324.
阅读次数
全文


摘要