切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 224 -229. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2024.03.005

论著

不同强度改良强制性运动疗法对脑卒中患者上肢肌肉形态及表面肌电的影响
刘胜锋1, 陈云强1,()   
  1. 1. 570216 海南 海口,海南医学院第二附属医院康复治疗科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-27 出版日期:2024-06-01
  • 通信作者: 陈云强
  • 基金资助:
    海南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(821QN0991); 海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(21A200268)

The impact of various intensities of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on the muscle morphology and surface electromyography of the upper limbs in stroke patients

Shengfeng Liu1, Yunqiang Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Rehabilitation Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570216, China
  • Received:2023-11-27 Published:2024-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yunqiang Chen
引用本文:

刘胜锋, 陈云强. 不同强度改良强制性运动疗法对脑卒中患者上肢肌肉形态及表面肌电的影响[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 224-229.

Shengfeng Liu, Yunqiang Chen. The impact of various intensities of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on the muscle morphology and surface electromyography of the upper limbs in stroke patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 224-229.

目的

研究不同强度改良强制性运动疗法(mCIMT)对脑卒中患者上肢肌肉形态及表面肌电的影响。

方法

选择2021年10月1日至2023年6月1日于海南医学院第二附属医院康复治疗科接受治疗的脑卒中患者128例,通过数字随机法分为观察组(n=64)和对照组(n=64)。2组患者均接受常规的康复治疗,对照组采用mCIMT,每日吊带限制健侧3 h,塑形训练、自我训练时间2 h/d。观察组每日吊带限制健侧3 h,塑形训练、自我训练时间>3 h/d。测量2组患者治疗前和治疗6周后患侧肱三头肌、肱二头肌、腕伸肌的肌电值。使用超声检测肱三头肌、肱二头肌的肌肉厚度、横截面积,并记录上肢Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(FMA)评分,通过独立样本t检验、配对样本t检验比较上述数值的组间、组内差异。

结果

观察组患者每日平均自我训练时长为(3.95±0.93)h。2组患者治疗后肱三头肌、肱二头肌、腕伸肌的表面肌电图(sEMG)均方根值(RMS)、肱二头肌的横截面积与厚度、FMA评分均较治疗前提升,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。经治疗后,观察组患者肱三头肌、肱二头肌、腕伸肌的RMS优于对照组[肱三头肌:(128.73±31.12)μV vs(119.47±17.48)μV;肱二头肌:(138.56±37.58)μV vs(122.76±29.66)μV;腕伸肌:(127.40±19.31)μV vs(118.24±20.68)μV)],差异均具有统计学意义(t=2.075、2.636、2.591,P=0.041、0.009、0.011)。观察组患者肱三头肌、肱二头肌的横截面积、厚度均高于对照组[肱三头肌:(3.10±0.56)cm2vs(2.92±0.42)cm2,(14.56±1.32)mm vs(13.88±1.37)mm;肱二头肌:(3.34±0.99)cm2vs(3.07±0.35)cm2,(15.15±1.54)mm vs(14.63±1.35)mm)],差异均具有统计学意义(t=2.034、2.016、2.056、2.054,P=0.044、0.046、0.042、0.042)。观察组患者治疗后上肢FMA评分高于对照组[(38.10±9.51)分vs(32.64±7.32)分)],差异具有统计学意义(t=3.641,P<0.001)。

结论

进一步增加mCIMT的训练强度(每日训练>3 h)可提高脑卒中患者上肢的sEMG表现及FMA评分,增加患者肱三头肌以及肱二头肌的肌肉厚度与横截面积,有助于脑卒中后患者上肢功能的恢复。

Objective

To investigate the impact of various intensities of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on the morphology and surface electromyography of upper limb muscles in stroke patients.

Methods

A total of 128 stroke patients who received treatment in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of our hospital from October 1, 2021, to June 1, 2023, were randomly divided into an observation group (n=64) and a control group (n=64) using numerical randomization. Both groups of patients received routine rehabilitation treatment, while the control group received mCIMT with daily sling restrictions on the healthy side for 3 hours, and underwent shaping training and self-training for 2 hours per day. The observation group was restricted to the healthy side with a daily sling for 3 hours, and the time for shaping and self-training was>3 hours/day. The EMG values of the triceps, biceps, and extensor carpi of the affected side of the two groups were compared before and 6 weeks after treatment. The muscle thickness and cross-sectional area of the triceps and biceps were measured by ultrasonic muscle, and the value of Upper Limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (UFMA) was recorded. Compare the inter-group and intra-group differences of the above values through independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test.

Results

The average daily self-training duration of the observation group patients was (3.95±0.93) hours. After treatment, the surface electromyography (sEMG) root mean square value (RMS), cross-sectional area, and thickness of the triceps brachii, biceps brachii, and extensor carpi of both groups of patients showed significant improvements compared to previous treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the surface electromyography (sEMG) root mean square (RMS) of the triceps brachii, biceps brachii, and extensor carpi in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group [triceps brachii: (128.73±31.12) μV vs (119.47±17.48) μV; Biceps brachii: (138.56±37.58) μV vs (122.76±29.66) μV; Extensor carpi: (127.40±19.31) μV vs (118.24±20.68) μV]. The differences were statistically significant (t=2.075, 2.636, 2.591; P=0.041, 0.009, 0.011). The cross-sectional area and thickness of the triceps and biceps brachii in the observation group were higher than those in the control group [triceps brachii: (3.10±0.56) cm2vs (2.92±0.42) cm2, (14.56±1.32) mm vs (13.88±1.37) mm; biceps brachii: (3.34±0.99) cm2vs (3.07 ± 0.35) cm2, (15.15±1.54) mm vs (14.63±1.35) mm], and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.034, 2.016, 2.056, 2.054; P=0.044, 0.046, 0.042, 0.042). The FMA scores of the observation group patients after treatment were significantly higher than those of the control group [(38.10±9.51) points vs (32.64±7.32) points], and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.641, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Further increasing the training intensity of mCIMT (daily training>3 h) can significantly improve the sEMG performance of upper limbs and the score of FMA scale in stroke patients. It can also increase the muscle thickness and cross-sectional area of the biceps and triceps, helping patients recover upper limb function after a stroke.

表1 脑卒中患者治疗前后肱三头肌、肱二头肌、腕伸肌的表面肌电图均方根值比较(μV,
x¯±s
表2 脑卒中患者治疗前后肱三头肌、肱二头肌肌肉形态比较(
x¯±s
表3 脑卒中患者治疗前后上肢Fugl-Meyer运动功能量表评分比较(分,
x¯±s
1
沈惠, 王光旭, 王兴. 改良强制性运动疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能影响的meta分析 [J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2019, 34(10): 1216-1223.
2
Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [J]. Stroke, 2016, 47(6): e98-e169.
3
Souza WC, Conforto AB, Orsini M, et al. Similar effects of two modified constraint-induced therapy protocols on motor impairment, motor function and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke [J]. Neurol Int, 2015, 7(1): 5430.
4
Lee HJ, Moon HI, Kim JS, et al. Is there a dose-dependent effect of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with hemiplegia [J]. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019, 45(1): 57-66.
5
中华神经科学会, 中华神经外科学会. 各项脑血管病诊断要点 [J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 1997, 13(1): 2-5.
6
焦俊杰, 郭洪亮, 刘丽杰, 等. 强制性运动疗法对急性脑卒中后偏瘫患者早期神经功能的影响研究 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2016, 19(16): 1968-1971.
7
曲斯伟, 朱琳, 严莉, 等. 运动想象联合改良强制性运动疗法对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响 [J]. 中国康复, 2022, 37(3): 131-135.
8
Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy to treatment outcome [J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2006, 21(2): 147-156.
9
Medical Advisory Secretariat, Health Quality Ontario. Constraint-induced movement therapy for rehabilitation of arm dysfunction after stroke in adults: an evidence-based analysis [J]. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, 2011, 11(6): 1-58.
10
宋春红, 扈慧静, 张玉霞, 等. 上肢康复机器人训练脑卒中的肌肉超声检测 [J]. 中国伤残医学, 2018, 26(12): 17-19.
11
罗思宇. 评估急性脑卒中病情及预后的肠源性指标 [J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2021, 38(10): 1138-1139.
12
田亚星, 洪永锋, 阚秀丽, 等. 徒手感觉刺激对脑卒中偏瘫患者手指痉挛效果的表面肌电图观察 [J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2022, 28(5): 515-519.
13
胡义茜, 白玉龙. 强制性运动疗法的作用机制与临床应用研究进展 [J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2020, 42(10): 956-960.
14
Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol [J]. Eura Medicophys, 2006, 42(3): 257-268.
15
Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT [J]. Neurology, 2009, 73(3): 195-201.
16
Page SJ, Levine P, Khoury JC. Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice: thinking through better motor outcomes [J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(2): 551-554.
17
秦茵, 毕胜, 李玲, 等. 改制强制性运动疗法对脑卒中上肢运动功能的影响 [J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(4): 367-369.
18
Peurala SH, Kantanen MP, Sjögren T, et al. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2012, 26(3): 209-223.
[1] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[2] 王益佳, 周青, 曹省, 袁芳洁, 周妍, 张梅. 中国经胸超声心动图检查存图及报告质控现状分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 657-663.
[3] 周易, 张红梅, 尹立雪, 杨浩, 付培. 四川省超声医学质量控制指标动态变化趋势分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 664-670.
[4] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[5] 王晓娜, 张宁, 宋伟, 杨明, 李丽, 薛红元. 河北省超声医学质量管理与控制现状分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 675-680.
[6] 张亚庆, 黄旴宁, 许珊珊, 刘小蓝. 海南省二级与三级医院超声医学质量控制指标分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 681-685.
[7] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[8] 吴禾禾, 马春亮, 常青, 陈宇, 牛丽娟, 王勇. 超声医学质量控制与住院医师规范化培训相结合的实践探讨[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 698-701.
[9] 莫莹, 李文秀, 李刚, 王霄芳, 王强, 丁文虹. 超声心动图在三尖瓣下移畸形中的临床应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 702-708.
[10] 金从稳, 陈霖霖, 刘浩, 余有声, 陈本鑫. 超声联合细针穿刺定位在乳腺微小病灶切除中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 423-426.
[11] 张红君, 郑博文, 廖梅, 任杰. 超声及超声造影在肝移植术后上腹部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 562-567.
[12] 赵阳, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 党晓智, 蔡林利, 薛文欣, 李洋, 肖瑶, 郭妤绮, 宋宏萍. 基于自动乳腺超声的列线图模型早期预测HER-2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的临床价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-362.
[13] 曹建辉, 冯斌, 黄伟伟, 张超. 超声造影在乳腺BI-RADS 4A类结节诊断及穿刺活检中的应用价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-368.
[14] 王雪, 梁佳, 张伊. 超声心动图联合心电图对游泳运动员左心室肥厚的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-374.
[15] 赵欣, 李昊昌, 卫星彤. 多模态超声在非肿块型乳腺病变中的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 407-410.
阅读次数
全文


摘要