切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 501 -507. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9248.2026.05.004

论著

国产新型瘤内扰流装置在大脑中动脉分叉部宽颈动脉瘤中的应用
金伟亮1, 张福峻晖2, 张义森1,2,†()   
  1. 1 100070 北京,首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科
    2 100070 北京,首都医科大学北京市神经外科研究所神经介入中心
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-02 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张义森
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展脑重大疾病科研专项(首发脑专项2024-1-1012)

Application of a novel Chinese intrasaccular flow disruption device in the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery

Weiliang Jin1, Fujunhui Zhang2, Yisen Zhang1,2,†()   

  1. 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
    2 Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2026-07-02 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yisen Zhang
引用本文:

金伟亮, 张福峻晖, 张义森. 国产新型瘤内扰流装置在大脑中动脉分叉部宽颈动脉瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 501-507.

Weiliang Jin, Fujunhui Zhang, Yisen Zhang. Application of a novel Chinese intrasaccular flow disruption device in the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 501-507.

目的

探索国产Tulip瘤内扰流装置治疗大脑中动脉(MCA)分叉部宽颈动脉瘤的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

前瞻性纳入2023年3—11月首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院等8家医学中心收治的43例MCA分叉部囊性动脉瘤患者并完成全程随访,共43个动脉瘤,其中40个为宽颈动脉瘤。所有患者均接受Tulip装置血管内介入治疗,记录手术成功率、动脉瘤闭塞程度(Raymond-Roy分级)、神经功能预后[改良Rankin量表(mRS)]及围手术期并发症情况,并完成术后12个月数字减影血管造影随访。

结果

技术成功率为100.00%(43/43),共植入44枚Tulip装置。术后12个月,患者的完全闭塞率为44.19%(19/43),充分闭塞率为95.35%(41/43),mRS评分0、1、2分的患者分别有40例、2例和1例。术中无不良事件发生;术后发生短暂性脑缺血发作、血栓形成等事件共3例。

结论

Tulip装置用于治疗MCA分叉部宽颈动脉瘤的操作简便,短期随访显示动脉瘤闭塞率满意、并发症发生率较低。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of the Chinese Tulip intrasaccular flow disruption device in the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery (MCA).

Methods

A total of 43 consecutive patients with saccular MCA bifurcation aneurysms were prospectively enrolled from eight medical centers in China between March and November 2023 and completed the full follow-up protocol. Among the 43 aneurysms, 40 were classified as wide-necked. All patients underwent endovascular treatment with the Tulip device. The technical success rate, degree of aneurysm occlusion (Raymond-Roy classification), neurological functional outcomes [modified Rankin scale (mRS)], and perioperative complications were recorded. Digital subtraction angiography follow-up was completed at 12 months post-procedure.

Results

The technical success rate was 100.00% (43/43), with a total of 44 Tulip devices successfully implanted. At the 12-month follow-up, the complete occlusion rate was 44.19% (19/43) and the adequate occlusion rate was 95.35% (41/43), and the mRS scores were 0 in 40 patients, 1 in 2 patients, and 2 in 1 patient. There were no intraoperative adverse events, and a total of 3 postoperative events including transient ischemic attack and thrombosis occurred.

Conclusion

The Tulip device is easy to use in the treatment of wide-necked MCA bifurcation aneurysms. Short-term follow-up reveals satisfactory occlusion rates and a low complication rate.

图1 国产Tulip瘤内扰流装置示意图
表1 43例大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤患者基线资料及动脉瘤特征
表2 43例大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤患者的临床及随访结果
图2 1例63岁女性右大脑中动脉分叉部宽颈动脉瘤的典型影像学资料。图a为术前三维重建结果,箭头示右大脑中动脉分叉部4.63 mm×4.36 mm×3.59 mm囊状动脉瘤;图b为术前数字减影血管造影(DSA)结果,箭头示右大脑中动脉分叉部囊状动脉瘤;图c为置入Tulip装置(TJEFD09009)术后即刻DSA结果,箭头示动脉瘤内装置置入;图d为置入Tulip装置术后即刻透视图像,箭头示动脉瘤内装置成功释放;图e为术后12个月DSA随访结果,箭头示Raymond-Roy分级为1级;图f为术后12个月随访结果(透视图像),箭头示Raymond-Roy分级为1级
1
Etminan N, Ruigrok YM, Hackenberg KAM, et al. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and emerging concepts in unruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2025, 24(11): 945-957.
2
Tau N, Sadeh-Gonik U, Aulagner G, et al. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms: update of a systematic review with Meta-analysis [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018, 166: 110-115.
3
吴永发, 黄清海, 刘建民, 等. 支架置入治疗大脑中动脉动脉瘤相关血管形态改变 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(3): 179-185.
4
Bartolini B, Blanc R, Pistocchi S, et al. "Y" and "X" stent-assisted coiling of complex and wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014, 35(11): 2153-2158.
5
Fiorella D, Pierot L, Szikora I, et al. The WISE study-WEB implant safety and long-term effectiveness: a pooled analysis of seven clinical trials - 1-year unruptured aneurysm results [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2026, jnis-2026-025724.
6
Rozemond FM, Kortman H, Boukrab I, et al. Rebleeding, retreatment, and 1-year occlusion rate after WEB treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of the WEB-21 vs WEB-17 systems [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2026, jnis-2025-024540.
7
Ktayen H, Akhunbay-Fudge CY, Tyagi AK, et al. Endovascular treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms using the novel contour neurovascular system: 5-year follow-up [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2025, 46(7): 1387-1394.
8
Hecker C, Broussalis E, Pfaff JAR, et al. Comparison of the Contour Neurovascular System and Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms at a bifurcation or sidewall [J]. J Neurosurg, 2023, 139(2): 563-572.
9
Akhunbay-Fudge CY, Deniz K, Tyagi AK, et al. Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the novel Contour Neurovascular System: a single-center safety and feasibility study [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2020, 12(10): 987-992.
10
Griessenauer CJ, Ghozy S, Biondi A, et al. Contour Neurovascular System for endovascular embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study of 10 European neurovascular centers [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2025, 17(4): 399-404.
11
中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会, 中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组. 中国颅内未破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(9): 634-664.
12
中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会, 中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组. 中国颅内破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(8): 546-574.
13
Rodriguez Caamaño I, Remollo S, Terceño M, et al. Y stent-assisted coiling technique for bifurcation aneurysms using double Neuroform® Stent: a large restrospective series [J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2024, 34(4): 919-928.
14
Arthur AS, Molyneux A, Coon AL, et al. WEB-IT Study investigators. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) study [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(9): 924-930.
15
Saver JL, Chaisinanunkul N, Campbell BCV, et al. Standardized nomenclature for modified rankin scale global disability outcomes: consensus recommendations from stroke therapy academic industry roundtable Ⅺ [J]. Stroke, 2021, 52(9): 3054-3062.
16
王玉洁, 白璇, 李新辉, 等. 缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作处理指南2008 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2008, 2(4): 214-256.
17
Ebbesen BH, Grøntved S, Hedegaard JN, et al. Long-term fatigue following transient ischemic attack: a prospective cohort study [J]. Neurology, 2025, 104(11): e213605.
18
Hetts SW, Turk A, English JD, et al. Matrix and platinum science trial investigators. Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone in unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the matrix and platinum science trial: safety, efficacy, and mid-term outcomes [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014, 35(4): 698-705.
19
Fiorella D, Molyneux A, Coon A, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 5 year results of the pivotal WEB Intra-saccular Therapy study (WEB-IT) [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2023, 15(12): 1175-1180.
20
Ghozy S, Lashin BI, Elfil M, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of early experience [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2024, 30(4): 496-505.
21
Wang K, Huang Q, Hong B, et al. Correlation of aneurysm occlusion with actual metal coverage at neck after implantation of flow-diverting stent in rabbit models [J]. Neuroradiology, 2012, 54(6): 607-613.
22
Abbas R, Sweid A, Salem MM, et al. Predictors of occlusion, long-term outcomes, and safety in a cohort of 674 aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device [J]. J Neurosurg, 2024, 141(1): 175-183.
[1] 李友, 唐林峰, 杜伟伟, 刘海亮, 巨积辉, 王东林. 双骨隧道重建止点治疗手指近指间关节掌板撕脱性损伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(04): 266-270.
[2] 祖力皮喀尔·图孙尼亚孜, 何荣东, 蒋铁民, 温浩. 老年单纯胆总管结石患者行腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术的临床疗效与危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 325-331.
[3] 王思竣, 王琼, 李珂雨, 袁新普, 张硕珉, 马睿, 谢天宇, 张朝军. 胃上部癌新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗后实施近端胃切除术的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 637-641.
[4] 汪韬, 潘炳权, 郁林海. 经脐入路三通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性与疗效分析:附10 000例报告[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 791-797.
[5] 韩晓钊, 杨能红, 韩民, 李永宁, 冉勋, 张宏, 何志伟, 罗加农, 喻超. 机器人与腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术安全性及疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 568-574.
[6] 潘胜淇, 李兴源, 王佳琦, 关竣庭, 丁可, 常泽文, 汤庆超. 三臂与四臂达芬奇机器人手术系统在乙状结肠与中高位直肠癌根治术中应用的近期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 509-515.
[7] 毕春, 吴晓明, 吴剑宏. 双钢板与髓内钉固定治疗伴肱骨内侧距粉碎性肱骨近端骨折的影像学及临床疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 96-103.
[8] 马泽坤, 姜世豪, 吴鹏飞, 阿力玛斯·阿布力孜, 杨文博, 尹胜楠, 王增亮. Pipeline血流导向装置治疗颅内大型与巨大型动脉瘤效果分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 358-364.
[9] 戴伟川, 郭协力, 蔡文华, 孙敏, 陈英贤, 齐震. 周围神经松解术治疗中-重型尿毒症周围神经病变的疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(05): 298-306.
[10] 王艺, 程美雄, 徐如祥, 张天, 吴娅秋. Neuroform Atlas支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 92-99.
[11] 胡贤瑞, 马惠, 赵科洪, 陈港琳, 何竟. 基于倾向性评分匹配分析重症脑血管疾病患者早期康复物理治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 208-213.
[12] 张婧萱, 郭佳星, 李紫红, 陈怡颖, 乔媛, 宝莹娜. 多线治疗失败后31例复发转移性结直肠癌局部挽救性放射治疗的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 206-211.
[13] 徐林, 简讯, 刘道权, 易东, 鄢华. 人工智能在心脑血管内介入诊疗中的应用进展——从单一影像模式到多模态影像融合[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 334-341.
[14] 芮春朵, 沈海林, 杜红娣, 邱志富, 于乐林, 李振凯, 叶娟. 多模态磁共振成像技术在食蟹猴脑缺血再灌注模型建立中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 526-531.
[15] 田婉君, 马晓瑭. 星形胶质细胞衍生的细胞外囊泡在脑血管功能调控中的作用和机制研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 451-457.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?