切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 167 -171. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2020.03.010

所属专题: 文献

综述

自发性脑出血预后量表的研究现状
寿碧江1, 李东芳1,()   
  1. 1. 030000 太原,山西医科大学第二医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 李东芳

Research status of prognostic scales for spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage

Bijiang Shou1, Dongfang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology,Second Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China
  • Received:2020-04-13 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Dongfang Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Dongfang, Email:
引用本文:

寿碧江, 李东芳. 自发性脑出血预后量表的研究现状[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 167-171.

Bijiang Shou, Dongfang Li. Research status of prognostic scales for spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 167-171.

自发性脑出血的发病率占全部脑卒中的10%~15%,具有高发病率、高病死率、高致残率的特点。较早的对脑出血患者临床转归进行评估,筛选出高危患者,积极有效地进行治疗,可以最大程度地降低病死率及致残率,改善患者生存质量,从而减轻社会和家庭的负担。脑出血预后量表是通过对造成不良后果或良好结局的预测因子进行赋值后用于预测脑出血患者转归的临床评分工具。本文将对已经问世的部分自发性脑出血预后量表进行对比,探讨其研究现状。

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) accounts for 10% to 15% of all strokes and is characterized by high morbidity, high mortality, and high disability. Early evaluation of the clinical outcomes of patients with cerebral hemorrhage, screening and recognition of high-risk patients, and actively and effectively treatment can minimize the mortality and disability, improve the quality of life of patients, and reduce the burden on society and families. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) prognostic scales are a group of clinical scoring tools used to predict the outcome of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage by assigning predictors that cause adverse consequences or good outcomes. This article compared the published prognostic scales of SICH to discuss the current status of this topic.

1
Steiner T, Petersson J, Al-Shahi Salman R, et al. European research priorities for intracerebral haemorrhage [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2011, 32(05): 409-419.
2
Steiner T, Al-Shahi Salman R, Beer R, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage [J]. Int J Stroke, 2014, 09(07): 840-855.
3
李迪, 王文志, 孙海欣. 脑出血临床评估量表研究进展 [J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2016, 18(01): 103-105.
4
Hemphill JC, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, et al. The ICH scale:a supple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(04): 891-897.
5
Nisar T, Alchaki A, Hillen M. Validation of ICH score in a large urban population [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018, 174: 36-39.
6
Cheung RT, Zou LY. Use of the original, modified, or new intracerebral hemorrhage scale to predict mortality and morbidity after intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(07): 1717-1722.
7
Poungvarin N, Suwanwela NC, Venketasubramanian N, et al. Grave prognosis on spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: GP On STAGE score [J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2006, 89(05): S84-S93.
8
Ruiz JL, Chiquete E, Romero VS, et al. Grading scale for prediction of outcome in primary intracerebral hemorrhages [J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(05): 1641-1644.
9
Chuang YC, Chen YM, Peng SK, et al. Risk stratification for predicting 30-day mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2009, 21(06): 441-447.
10
Song EC, Chu K, Jeong SW, et al. Hyperglycemia exacerbates brain edema and perihematomal cell death after intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(09): 2215-2220.
11
张硕, 马爽, 李维帅, 等. SICH量表对自发性脑出血短期临床结局的预测作用 [J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2016, 36(01): 7-11.
12
Li YF, Luo J, Li Q, et al. A new simple model for prediction of hospital mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2012, 18(06): 482-486.
13
成涛, 杨柳, 郭庚, 等. 脑出血指数对急性脑出血病人预后评估的临床价值 [J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2016, 14(23): 2747-2750.
14
Chen HS, Hsieh CF, Chau TT, et al. Risk factors of in-hospital mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage and comparison of ICH scores in a Taiwanese population [J]. Eur Neurol, 2011, 66(01): 59-63.
15
Tshikwela ML, Longo-Mbenza B. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage:clinical and computed tomography findings in predicting in-hospital mortality in Central Africans [J]. J Neurosci Rural Pract, 2012, 03(02): 115-120.
16
Smith EE, Shobha N, Dai N, et al. A risk scale for in-hospital death in patients admitted with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke [J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2013, 02(01): e207.
17
Csiba L, Széll I, Szepesi R, et al. New prognostic scale for the prediction of 30-day outcome in spontaneous supratentorial cerebral hemorrhage [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2013, 333: e237.
18
Kariman H, Hatamabadi H, Shojaee M, et al. Validation of SUSPEKT score in predicting one-month mortality of patients with hemorrhagic stroke; a diagnostic accuracy study [J]. Arch Acad Emerg Med, 2019, 07(01): e56.
19
Zis P, Leivadeas P, Michas D, et al. Predicting 30-day case fatality of primary inoperable intracerebral hemorrhage based on finding at the emergency department [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2014, 23(07): 1928-1933.
20
Zis P, Leivadeas P, Tavernarakis A. EDICH; a novel grading scale for predicting the 30-Day case fatality of primary inoperable intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24(05): 1104-1105.
21
Masotti L, Napoli DM, Godoy DA, et al. Predictive ability of a modified version of emergency department intracerebral hemorrhage grading scale for short-term prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24(05): 1100-1104.
22
Farzad R, Reza R, Alireza A, et al. Predicting 30-day mortality in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: Evaluation of the value of intracerebral hemorrhage and modified new intracerebral hemorrhage scores [J]. Iran J Neurol, 2018, 17(01): 47-52.
23
Weimar C, Benemann J, Diener HC. Development and validation of the Essen intracerebral haemorrhage scale [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2006, 77(05): 601-605.
24
Rost NS, Smith EE, Chang Y, et al. Prediction of functional outcome in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: The FUNC scale [J]. Stroke, 2008, 39(08): 2304-2309.
25
Masotti L, Lorenzini G, Pennati P, et al. Clinical grading scales for predicting early neurological worsening in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Stroke Research and Therapy, 2016, 01(01): 3.
26
Godoy DA, Pinero G, Napoli M, et al. Predicting mortality in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: can modification to original score improve the prediction? [J]. Stroke, 2006, 37(04): 1038-1044.
27
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system [J]. Crit Care Med, 1985, 13(10): 818-829.
28
Cho DY, Chen CC, Lee WY, et al. A new modified Intracerobral hemorrhage score for treatment decisions In basal ganglia hemorrhage-a randomized trial [J]. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(07): 2151-2156.
29
Ji R, Shen H, Pan Y, et al. A novel risk scale to predict 1-year functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage and comparison with existing scales [J]. Critical Care, 2013, 17(06): R275.
30
Jarno S, Satu M, Atte M, et al. Comparison of all 19 published prognostic scales for intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2017, 379: 103-108.
31
Huang BR, Liao CC, Huang WH, et al. Prognostic factors of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage in haemodialysis patients and predictors of 30-day mortality [J]. Int Med J, 2008, 38(07): 568-574.
32
Graeb DA, Robertson WD, Lapointe JS, et al. Computed tomographic diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage. Etiology And prognosis [J]. Radiology, 1982, 143(01): 91-96.
33
Hallevi H, Dar NS, Barreto AD, et al. The IVH score:a novel tool for estimating intraventricular hemorrhage volume: clinical and research implications [J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37(03): 969-974.
34
Morgan TC, Dawson J, Spengler D, et al. The Modified Graeb Score: an enhanced tool for intraventricular hemorrhage measurement and prediction of functional outcome [J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(03): 635-641.
35
Aysenne AM, Albright KC, Mathias T, et al. 24-Hour ICH scale is a better predictor of outcome than admission ICH scale [J]. ISRN Stroke, 2013, 2013: 1-4.
36
Meyer DM, Begtrup K, Grotta JC. Is the ICH scale a valid predictor of mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage? [J]. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 2015, 27(07): 351-355.
[1] 赵立连, 卢明峰, 魏锦强, 何利雷, 许挺, 邢基斯, 王昌兵. 基于WOS数据库巨大肩袖撕裂全球研究现状与热点分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 119-130.
[2] 徐昌林, 程浩, 刘从国, 高涢, 李毅, 乔媛媛, 陈晟. Rosa定位钻孔血肿清除术与经验性定位颅骨钻孔血肿清除术治疗自发性脑出血的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 97-101.
[3] 汤志辉, 黄巍, 罗飞, 王文浩. 自发性脑出血患者流行病学特点与死亡影响因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 224-228.
[4] 张寒, 丁涟沭. CT联合征象及纹理分析在预测自发性脑出血血肿扩大中的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 242-246.
[5] 唐辉, 陈勇, 邵川, 罗孝全, 王潇娅, 邹成功, 文国虹, 何家全. 南充市自发性脑出血发病与气温的相关性及滞后效应[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(04): 202-207.
[6] 裴园利, 柏鲁宁. 自发性脑出血血肿扩大的影响因素与预后分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(01): 27-30.
[7] 聂兆波, 康全利, 李伟, 马赛男. 微创穿刺引流术治疗幕上自发性脑出血的临床效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(03): 157-160.
[8] 谭可, 李锦平, 彭玉涛, 吴文汧, 杨子文, 汪阳, 陶立波, 刘畅. 机器人辅助立体定向血肿引流术治疗自发性脑出血疗效及卫生经济学评价[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 205-214.
[9] 谭潇潇, 付雄洁, 俞晓波, 严锋, 陈高. 不同微创手术方式治疗自发性脑出血疗效对比:单中心回顾性分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 21-26.
[10] 于强, 黄好峰, 李习珍, 胡海成, 李春, 张成, 韩超, 王如海, 曹祥记. 深静脉穿刺包行经皮气管切开术在神经重症患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(05): 281-284.
[11] 康德智. 出血性脑血管病诊疗新进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(02): 65-68.
[12] 孙飞, 罗军, 向金波, 胡小燕. 川崎病病原菌感染及易感基因多态性的研究现状[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 89-92.
[13] 庄坚炜, 陈向林, 侯文仲, 胡杨真, 毛振敏, 黄俊士. CT平扫血肿分级方式联合多危险因素对自发性脑出血早期血肿增大的预测作用[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 92-99.
[14] 张钦, 杨清武. 自发性脑出血动物模型的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 64-69.
阅读次数
全文


摘要