切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 350 -358. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2023.04.008

临床研究

椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤介入治疗的疗效分析
杜小林, 陈鄂, 康俊龙, 肖庆, 丰伟, 田新华()   
  1. 550084 贵阳,贵州医科大学附属金阳医院神经外科
    361000 福建厦门,厦门大学附属中山医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-10 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 田新华
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金项目(2019J01562); 贵阳市高层次创新型青年卫生人才培养计划项目(【2021】筑卫健科技合同字第24号)

Efficacy of endovascular treatment for vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms

Xiaolin Du, E Chen, Junlong Kang, Qing Xiao, Wei Feng, Xinhua Tian()   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, the Jinyang Hospital Affiliated to Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550084, China
    Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, China
  • Received:2022-12-10 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xinhua Tian
引用本文:

杜小林, 陈鄂, 康俊龙, 肖庆, 丰伟, 田新华. 椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤介入治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 350-358.

Xiaolin Du, E Chen, Junlong Kang, Qing Xiao, Wei Feng, Xinhua Tian. Efficacy of endovascular treatment for vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 350-358.

目的

总结椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤(VBDA)介入栓塞治疗的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年4月至2018年4月厦门大学附属中山医院收治的37例VBDA患者(32枚VBDA病灶)的临床资料,包括一般资料、动脉瘤特征和围术期并发症发生情况等,记录患者出院时及随访6个月时的临床预后,采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评价患者术后预后情况。

结果

37例患者中男性24例,女性13例,年龄为54(24~78)岁。接受介入治疗29例,拒绝手术8例。32枚VBDA病灶中25枚接受支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗,3枚行单纯弹簧圈栓塞治疗,4枚行动脉瘤及载瘤动脉闭塞术。所有患者均在早期行介入治疗(<72 h)。术后随访过程中共有4枚出现复发,再次行介入治疗,其余均保持稳定。椎动脉夹层动脉瘤随访中预后极好13例,好3例,差1例,死亡0例;基底动脉夹层动脉瘤随访中预后极好7例,好2例,差3例,死亡0例。椎动脉夹层动脉瘤入院时Hunt-Hess分级越低者预后越好(H=7.566,P=0.006),基底动脉夹层动脉瘤入院时Hunt-Hess分级、世界神经外科联盟(WFNS)分级越低者预后越好(H=5.666,P=0.017)。另外,VBDA患者入院时Hunt-Hess分级为0~Ⅲ级组预后极好的比例明显高于Ⅳ~Ⅴ组,比例分别为90.0% vs 22.2%,P=0.001。

结论

VBDA的介入治疗是安全有效的,可降低术后再出血风险,没有明显的手术并发症,并有良好的随访结果,且术前较低的Hunt-Hess分级能获得良好的临床结果。另外,早期栓塞不影响临床结果,但降低了再出血的风险。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm (VBDA).

Methods

Thirty-seven patients with dissecting aneurysms in the vertebrobasilar artery admitted to Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University from April 2014 to April 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The demographic data, the characteristics of aneurysms, and the incidence of perioperative complications in the patients were collected. The clinical prognosis of the patients at discharge and 6 months of follow-up were recorded, and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to evaluate the postoperative outcomes.

Results

Among the 37 patients, there were 24 men and 13 women with a mean age of 54 years (range 24-78 years). Endovascular treatments were applied in a total of 29 patients, and the other 8 refused surgery. The study included 32 VBDA, of which 25 were treated with stent-coil embolization, 3 with pure coil embolization, and 4 with permanent occlusion of vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms and/or vertebral artery. All patients underwent early endovascular treatment (<72 h). During the postoperative follow-up, 4 cases recurred and underwent interventional treatment again, and the rest remained stable. In the follow-up of the vertebral artery and the basilar artery dissecting aneurysm, the prognosis was excellent in 13 cases and 7 cases; good in 3 cases and 2 cases; poor in 1 case and 3 cases; and no cases of deaths have been reported, respectively; and the lower the Hunt-Hess grade at admission for vertebral artery dissection aneurysm, the better the prognosis (H=7.566, P=0.006), and the lower the Hunt-Hess grade and the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS)grade at admission for basilar artery dissection aneurysm, the better the prognosis (H=5.666, P=0.017). In addition, the proportion of VBDA patients with Hunt-Hess grade 0 -Ⅲ at admission was a better outcome than that in the Ⅳ-Ⅴ group,with 90.0% vs 22.2%, P=0.001, respectively.

Conclusion

Endovascular interventional procedures of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms are applicable to most patients. They can prevent rebleeding safely and effectively without significant complications, showing a good follow-up outcome. Low preoperative Hunt-Hess grade can predict favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, early embolization can not affect clinical outcomes, but reduce the risk of rebleeding.

表1 37例VBDA患者的临床资料及影像学表现
表2 VBDA手术患者的临床症状、治疗策略和临床预后
表3 介入栓塞患者随访期间不同临床预后各组临床特征比较
表4 介入栓塞患者随访期间不同临床预后各组临床分级比较(例)
图1 1例53岁男性右侧椎动脉夹层动脉瘤破裂急性期患者Solitiar自膨式颅内支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗围术期影像学改变。图a为治疗前头颅CT,箭头示蛛网膜下腔出血;图b为治疗前急诊CT血管成像,箭头示右侧椎动脉夹层动脉瘤累及小脑后下动脉;图c为治疗前数字减影血管造影(DSA),箭头示右侧椎动脉夹层动脉瘤;图d为栓塞治疗后即刻DSA,箭头示右侧椎动脉夹层动脉瘤完全消失;图e为栓塞治疗后6个月复查DSA,箭头示动脉瘤复发
1
王忠诚. 神经外科学 [M]. 2版. 武汉: 湖北科学技术出版社, 2015.
2
Gong D, Yan B, Dowling R, et al. Successful treatment of growing basilar artery dissecting aneurysm by pipeline flow diversion embolization device [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2014, 23(6): 1713-1716.
3
Van Oel LI, Van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, et al. Reconstructive endovascular treatment of fusiform and dissecting basilar trunk aneurysms with flow diverters, stents, and coils [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2013, 34(3): 589-595.
4
Colby GP, Paul AR, Radvany MG, et al. A single center comparison of coiling versus stent assisted coiling in 90 consecutive paraophthalmic region aneurysms [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2012, 4(2): 116-120.
5
康俊龙, 田新华, 吴启锋, 等. 颅内动脉瘤破裂急性期LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗分析 [J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2020, 32(7): 828-834.
6
King B, Vaziri S, Singla A, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcomes after stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with Enterprise and Neuroform stents: a comparative analysis of the literature [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015, 7(12): 905-909.
7
Gory B, Klisch J, Bonafe A, et al. Solitaire AB stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: short-term results from a prospective, consecutive, European multicentric study [J]. Neuroradiology, 2013, 55(11): 1373-1378.
8
Zhang X, Zhong J, Gao H, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the LVIS device: a systematic review [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2017, 9(6): 553-557.
9
刘远来, 孙异春, 何永超, 等. Solitaire支架与lvis支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞对颅内宽颈动脉瘤的疗效对比 [J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2020, 40(3): 423-426.
10
张彤宇, 刘鹏, 向思诗, 等. 中国颅内破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(8): 546-574.
11
Kurata A, Ohmomo T, Miyasaka Y, et al. Coil embolization for the treatment of ruptured dissecting vertebral aneurysms [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2001, 22(1): 11-18.
12
Metso T, Metso A, Helenius J , et al. Prognosis and safety of anticoagulation in intracranial artery dissections in adults [J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(6): 1837-1842.
13
Mizutani T, Aruga T, Kirino T, et al. Recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage from untreated ruptured vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 1995, 36(5): 905-911.
14
Yamada M, Kitahara T, Kurata A, et al. Intracranial vertebral artery dissection with subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical characteristics and outcomes in conservatively treated patients [J]. J Neurosurg, 2004, 101(1): 25-30.
15
Aoki N, Sakai T. Rebleeding from intracranial dissecting aneurysm in the vertebral artery [J]. Stroke, 1990, 21(11): 1628-1631.
16
Lee JM, Kim TS, Joo SP, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured dissecting vertebral artery aneurysms—long-term follow-up results, benefits of early embolization, and predictors of outcome [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2010, 152(9): 1455-1465.
17
Kim BM, Shin YS, Kim SH, et al. Incidence and risk factors of recurrence after endovascular treatment of intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms [J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(9): 2425-2430.
18
Endo H, Otawara Y, Ogasawara K, et al. Ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm followed by spontaneous acute occlusion and early recanalization: case report [J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2005, 45(8): 400-403.
19
Shin YS, Kim BM, Kim SH, et al. Endovascular treatment of bilateral intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage [J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 70(1 Suppl Operative): 75-81.
20
尤锦, 王武, 顾斌贤, 等. 椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的血管内治疗 [J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2013, 22(7): 6.
21
Ha SW, Jang SJ. Clinical analysis of giant intracranial aneurysms with endovascular embolization [J]. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg, 2012, 14(1): 22-28.
22
So TY, Dowling R, Mitchell PJ, et al. Risk of growth in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective analysis [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2010, 17(1): 29-33.
23
Can A, Castro VM, Ozdemir YH, et al. Association of intracranial aneurysm rupture with smoking duration, intensity, and cessation [J]. Neurology, 2017, 89(13): 1408-1415.
24
杨博文, 李天晓, 薛绛宇, 等. 血管内治疗基底动脉夹层动脉瘤的随访研究 [J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2018, 34(8): 791-795.
25
Arnold M, Bousser MG, Fahrni G, et al. Vertebral artery dissection: presenting findings and predictors of outcome [J]. Stroke, 2006, 37(10): 2499-2503.
[1] 周帅, 王海波, 刘朋飞, 张继红, 马晓艳, 王喆, 张文学, 王金鹏, 王明鑫, 姜丽娜. 症状性椎动脉起始部重度狭窄/闭塞行椎动脉内膜切除术的疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 170-174.
[2] 陈晓琴, 陈广新, 郭昊, 成志国, 钟彦, 明照凯, 周志尊. 基于磁共振血管成像分析椎基底动脉交界区开窗与脑梗死的相关性研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 84-88.
[3] 陈晓琴, 李星江, 胡涛, 赵金义, 薛培源, 刘伟, 王崇, 胡明成. 椎基底动脉迂曲扩张症的计算流体力学分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 21-25.
[4] 陈爱霞, 吴培, 吴桥伟, 李俞辰, 胡旭晨, 姚金彪, 陈平伯, 史怀璋, 王跃华. 单纯血流导向装置治疗椎-基底动脉动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 241-246.
[5] 徐志嘉, 贾振宇, 赵林波, 刘圣, 施海彬, 曹月洲. 高敏肌钙蛋白T动态变化在晚时间窗内进行血管内治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的预测价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 42-47.
[6] 赖和泰, 刘羽, 程光森, 刘永康, 李忠亮, 陆骊工. 39例Surpass Streamline治疗未破裂动脉瘤患者诊疗分析:单中心临床经验[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 19-24.
[7] 王俊杰, 尹晓亮, 刘二腾, 陆军, 祁鹏, 胡深, 杨希孟, 陈鲲鹏, 张东, 王大明. 机器学习对预测颈内动脉非急性闭塞患者血管内再通术成功的潜在价值[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 464-470.
[8] 孙洪扬, 刘基, 龚字翔, 王广英, 宁召腾, 赵璇, 朱其义, 王贤军. 急性前循环大血管闭塞性轻型卒中血管内治疗的临床预后及手术时机选择[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 445-451.
[9] 袁兴运, 陈万红, 鱼丽萍, 姚力. 以Wallenberg综合征起病的椎动脉颅外段闭塞介入治疗探讨[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 394-399.
[10] 陆东生, 桂建康, 范衍, 刘春林, 李祉岑, 宫崧峰. 复合手术治疗椎动脉慢性闭塞一例[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 386-393.
[11] 张文胜, 幸伟芳, 谢颖, 何锦照. 急性前循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗头颅CT高密度影的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 159-162.
[12] 黎丹丹, 程峙娟, 刘旭, 陈未平, 殷敏, 郭华, 涂江龙. 急性后循环进展性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 112-123.
[13] 钱锦宏, 吴建东, 丁志良, 董晓峰, 唐晓宇, 马冕, 邓朋. 慢性症状性颈内动脉闭塞开通的初步探索[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 416-421.
[14] 李伟, 乜全民, 王增武, 郭晖, 秦时强. 后循环血管形态改变对急性椎基底动脉闭塞患者机械取栓临床预后的影响[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 320-325.
[15] 陈东升, 张萌, 张彩兰, 孙支唐. 急性基底动脉闭塞血管内治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 360-365.
阅读次数
全文


摘要