切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 426 -431. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9248.2026.04.011

基础研究

颈内动脉穿刺法建立蛛网膜下腔出血模型
陈苗苗1, 张文田1, 马宁2,3,()   
  1. 1 030002 山西太原,山西医科大学研究生院
    2 030002 山西太原,山西医科大学第一医院神经外科
    3 030027 山西太原,山西省心血管病医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-26 出版日期:2026-08-01
  • 通信作者: 马宁
  • 基金资助:
    山西省基础研究计划自然科学研究面上项目(202403021211175)

Establishment of a subarachnoid hemorrhage model using internal carotid artery puncture technique

Miaomiao Chen1, Wentian Zhang1, Ning Ma2,3,()   

  1. 1 Graduate School, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030002, China
    2 Department of Neurosurgery, the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030002, China
    3 Department of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Taiyuan 030027, China
  • Received:2026-04-26 Published:2026-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Ning Ma
引用本文:

陈苗苗, 张文田, 马宁. 颈内动脉穿刺法建立蛛网膜下腔出血模型[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 426-431.

Miaomiao Chen, Wentian Zhang, Ning Ma. Establishment of a subarachnoid hemorrhage model using internal carotid artery puncture technique[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 426-431.

目的

构建一种操作便捷、临床特征符合蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的大鼠模型的颈内动脉穿刺法。

方法

选取7~8周龄Sprague Dawley(SD)大鼠随机分为模型组和假手术组,每组20只。适应性喂养1周后进行造模。模型组大鼠采用颈内动脉血管内穿刺法构建SAH模型,麻醉后暴露颈总动脉、颈内动脉及颈外动脉,经颈外动脉残端插入预先制备的 4-0 聚丙烯缝合线至颈内动脉分叉处,突破血管壁后停留 3 s并重复推进2~3次,电凝止血后缝合切口。假手术组大鼠在线栓到达分叉处后及时拔出,不突破血管壁,其余步骤均与模型组相同。采用Sugawara改良评分法于造模后72 h评估2组大鼠的出血程度;采用改良加西亚评分于造模后24、48、72 h对2组大鼠的神经功能进行评估。组间比较采用独立样本t检验。

结果

模型组有18只大鼠存活,存活率为90.0%,Sugawara改良评分≥8分的大鼠有17只(94.4%),包括重度出血11只,中度出血6只。与假手术大鼠相比,模型组大鼠在所有时间点均观察到显著的神经功能损伤[24 h:(14.40±1.43)分 vs(16.20±1.23)分,t=3.019,P=0.007;48 h:(12.40±0.97)分 vs(16.60±1.18)分,t=8.737,P<0.001;72 h:(7.80±1.81)分 vs(17.20±1.14)分,t=13.890,P<0.001],且在造模后72 h时神经功能损伤最为严重。

结论

改良的颈内动脉穿刺法构建SAH模型具有可重复性强、操作简单、模型成功率高等优点,能更好地模拟临床动脉瘤破裂导致的SAH。

Objective

To establish a rat model of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) using an internal carotid artery (ICA) puncture technique that is technically straightforward and clinically relevant.

Methods

Forty 7-8-week-old Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were randomly allocated to a model group and a sham-operated group, with 20 rats in each group. After 1 week of adaptive feeding, surgical procedures were performed. In the model group, the SAH model was constructed via endovascular ICA puncture. Under anesthesia, the common carotid artery, ICA, and external carotid artery were exposed. A pre-prepared 4-0 polypropylene suture was inserted through the stump of the external carotid artery to the bifurcation of the ICA. The suture tip was then advanced to pierce the arterial wall​ at the bifurcation, held for 3 seconds, and this puncture process was repeated 2–3 times. Hemostasis was achieved by electrocoagulation, followed by incision suturing. In the sham-operated group, the suture was immediately withdrawn after reaching the bifurcation, and all other steps were identical to those of the model group. The modified Sugawara scoring system was used to evaluate the severity of hemorrhage at 72 hours after modeling. The modified Garcia scoring system was applied to assess the neurological function of rats in both groups at the same time points. Independent sample t-test was used for intergroup comparison.

Results

Eighteen rats survived in the model group, with a survival rate of 90.0%. Among the survivors, 17 rats (94.4%) achieved a modified Sugawara score ≥8, comprising 11 cases of severe hemorrhage and 6 cases of moderate hemorrhage. Compared with the sham-operated group, the model group showed significant neurological impairment at all time points (24 hours: 14.40±1.43 vs 16.20±1.23, t=3.019, P=0.007; 48 hours: 12.40±0.97 vs 16.60±1.18, t=8.737, P<0.001; 72 hours: 7.80±1.81 vs 17.20±1.14, t=13.890, P<0.001), with the most severe neurological impairment observed at 72 hours after modeling.

Conclusion

The modified ICA puncture technique for establishing the SAH model in this study demonstrates high reproducibility, technical simplicity, and a high success rate. This model effectively mimics the pathophysiology of aneurysmal SAH.

表1 改良加西亚评分的细则
图1 Sugawara改良评分法中脑基底池分区(图a)以及2级(图b)、3级(图c)评分实例[8] 注:MCA为大脑中动脉;ACA为前交通动脉;ICA为颈内动脉;PcomA为后交通动脉;pPCA为大脑后动脉近端;dPCA为大脑后动脉远端;SCA为小脑上动脉;BA为基底动脉
表2 2组大鼠造模后24 h改良加西亚评分比较(分,
±s
表3 2组大鼠造模后48 h改良加西亚评分比较(分,
±s
表4 2组大鼠造模后72 h改良加西亚评分比较(分,
±s
图2 采用Sugawara改良评分法评估蛛网膜下腔出血大鼠的出血情况。图a为假手术组;图b、c、d为模型组,图b、c为中度出血代表性图像,图d为重度出血代表性图像
1
Jabbarli R, Pierscianek D, Rölz R, et al. Endovascular treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: more is more[J]. Neurology, 2019, 93(5): e458-e466.
2
陈仕检, 梁志坚. 肿瘤相关蛛网膜下腔出血的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(2): 115-119.
3
赵媛媛, 关欣, 欧梦仙, 等. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血一体化急救护理的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(6): 601-605.
4
Leclerc JL, Garcia JM, Diller MA, et al. A comparison of pathophysiology in humans and rodent models of subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Front Mol Neurosci, 2018, 11: 71.
5
Silasi G, Colbourne F. Long-term assessment of motor and cognitive behaviours in the intraluminal perforation model of subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2009, 198(2): 380-387.
6
Prunell GF, Mathiesen T, Diemer NH, et al. Experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage: subarachnoid blood volume, mortality rate, neuronal death, cerebral blood flow, and perfusion pressure in three different rat models[J]. Neurosurgery, 2003, 52(1): 165-175; discussion 175-176.
7
Shishido H, Egashira Y, Okubo S, et al. A magnetic resonance imaging grading system for subarachnoid hemorrhage severity in a rat model[J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2015, 243: 115-119.
8
Munakata M, Kanazawa H, Kimura K, et al. Assessment of cardiac function in rat endovascular perforation model of subarachnoid hemorrhage: a model of subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced cardiac dysfunction[J]. Front Synaptic Neurosci, 2022, 14(1): 1028976.
9
Sugawara T, Ayer R, Jadhav V, et al. A new grading system evaluating bleeding scale in filament perforation subarachnoid hemorrhage rat model[J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2008, 167(2): 327-334.
10
Altay O, Suzuki H, Hasegawa Y, et al. Isoflurane on brain inflammation[J]. Neurobiol Dis, 2014, 62: 365-371.
11
Lantigua H, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Schmidt JM, et al. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: who dies, and why?[J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19(1): 412.
12
陈克非, 史继新. 蛛网膜下腔出血活体动物模型的研究进展[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2006, 11(1): 43-45.
13
Marbacher S, Fandiño J, Kitchen N. Characteristics of in vivo animal models of delayed cerebral vasospasm[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2011, 8(2): 173-175.
14
Pluta R, Bacher J, Skopets B, et al. A non-human primate model of aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)[J]. Transl Stroke Res, 2014, 5(6): 681-691.
15
Suzuki H, Kanamaru K, Tsunoda H, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 gene induction as an intrinsic regulation against delayed cerebral vasospasm in rats[J]. J Clin Invest, 1999, 104(1): 59-66.
16
单宏宽, 刘刚. 改良枕大池二次注血法建立大鼠蛛网膜下腔出血模型[J]. 中国医学创新, 2017, 14(22): 16-20.
17
Wang Y, Xu J, You W, et al. Roles of Rufy3 in experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced early brain injury via accelerating neuronal axon repair and synaptic plasticity[J]. Mol Brain, 2022, 15(1): 35.
18
Kooijman E, Nijboer CH, van Velthoven CT, et al. The rodent endovascular puncture model of subarachnoid hemorrhage: mechanisms of brain damage and therapeutic strategies[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2014, 11: 2.
19
卢小叶, 吕倩忆, 李棋龙, 等. Zea-longa评分与改良Garcia评分应用于针刺治疗CIRI大鼠神经功能缺损评估的研究[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2021, 41(9): 1356-1360.
20
李建华, 孙娟, 张艳, 等. 线栓长度对颈内动脉穿刺法建立大鼠蛛网膜下腔出血模型的影响[J]. 青海医学院学报, 2014, 35(3): 191-195.
21
Tang S, Xing W, Yan J, et al. TREM2 alleviates long-term cognitive dysfunction after subarachnoid hemorrhage in mice by attenuating hippocampal neuroinflammation via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway[J]. Brain Res, 2025, 1846: 149235.
[1] 刘珂, 曾晨玉, 李益坤, 钱雨馨, 辛明哲, 金磊. 直线加速器诱导的大鼠放射性颌骨坏死模型改进[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 51-60.
[2] 任志鹏, 王欢, 戴自强, 李尚轩, 张根, 杜保罗, 何东升, 崔官正, 张佳恒, 李欣, 李巅远, 潘登科. 并联式异种心脏移植基因编辑猪-恒河猴动物模型围手术期管理经验[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 189-192.
[3] 徐培康, 陈贵东, 陈正, 赖兴强. 改良套管法构建小鼠颈部异位心脏移植模型[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 152-157.
[4] 李若云, 罗文彬, 潘超凡, 罗瑞英, 罗长江. 大鼠动物模型在腹壁疝中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 344-347.
[5] 袁佳莹, 范小彧, 费博, 喻春钊. 结直肠癌肝转移研究模型的现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 40-46.
[6] 张行, 吕新文, 张超. 高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者气管切开时机及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 81-85.
[7] 熊俊彦, 张化明. 血浆PKM2早期表达水平对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血严重程度及预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 243-249.
[8] 周颖, 张琳琳, 陈光强, 石广志, 周建新. 阵发性交感神经过度兴奋四例临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 302-310.
[9] 齐洪武, 李晶晶. 干细胞治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 170-176.
[10] 宁波, 张嗣坤, 高飞, 令狐恩强, 施瑞华. 消化内镜机器人辅助系统对ESD的影响:一项基于动物实验的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 34-44.
[11] 多力坤·牙生, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 李义亮, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 国产机器人辅助食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术在猪模型中的应用[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2025, 12(03): 100-103.
[12] 胡婷, 杨露, 田媛媛. 目标体温阶梯式管理策略在重症蛛网膜下腔出血患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 103-108.
[13] 万孟夏, 杨毅, 申珅, 甘景环, 张拥波. 空气污染与脑卒中亚型的因果关联:孟德尔随机化分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 266-273.
[14] 曾凯声, 曹淯阳, 胡平, 鄢腾峰, 吴雁泽, 肖兵, 叶敏华, 吴淼经, 祝新根. 鞘内注射尿激酶治疗蛛网膜下腔出血的安全性及有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 197-203.
[15] 芮春朵, 沈海林, 杜红娣, 邱志富, 于乐林, 李振凯, 叶娟. 多模态磁共振成像技术在食蟹猴脑缺血再灌注模型建立中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 526-531.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?