切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 266 -273. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9248.2026.03.005

论著

空气污染与脑卒中亚型的因果关联:孟德尔随机化分析
万孟夏, 杨毅, 申珅, 甘景环, 张拥波()   
  1. 100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-18 出版日期:2026-06-01
  • 通信作者: 张拥波
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(82501445)

Causal association between air pollution and stroke subtypes: a Mendelian randomization study

Mengxia Wan, Yi Yang, Shen Shen, Jinghuan Gan, Yongbo Zhang()   

  1. Department of Neurology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2026-03-18 Published:2026-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yongbo Zhang
引用本文:

万孟夏, 杨毅, 申珅, 甘景环, 张拥波. 空气污染与脑卒中亚型的因果关联:孟德尔随机化分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 266-273.

Mengxia Wan, Yi Yang, Shen Shen, Jinghuan Gan, Yongbo Zhang. Causal association between air pollution and stroke subtypes: a Mendelian randomization study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 266-273.

目的

评估二氧化氮(NO2)、氮氧化物(NOx)、细颗粒物(PM2.5)和可吸入颗粒物(PM10)4种空气污染物与缺血性脑卒中、脑出血、蛛网膜下腔出血的风险之间是否存在因果关联。

方法

采用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)设计。将NO2、NOx、PM2.5和PM10等空气污染物相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)作为工具变量,摘要数据均来自英国生物银行(UKB)数据库。缺血性脑卒中、脑出血、蛛网膜下腔出血的数据分别来自MEGASTROKE项目、国际卒中遗传学联盟、全基因组关联研究2020年发表的欧洲人群动脉瘤破裂导致蛛网膜下腔出血部分。主要分析方法为逆方差加权法(IVW),并采用简单中位数法、加权中位数法、MR-Egger回归、留一法及MR-PRESSO法进行敏感性分析。

结果

随机效应IVW分析结果显示:PM2.5与蛛网膜下腔出血存在名义上的关联,但置信区间较宽(OR=5.75,95%CI:1.13~29.20,P=0.035);经Bonferroni校正后,该名义相关信号不再具有统计学意义。进一步敏感性分析结果显示,留一法及MR-PRESSO法识别出离群SNP,在校正离群值后,效应量大幅降低且差异无统计学意义(OR=2.05,95%CI:0.98~4.29,P=0.069)。未发现其他空气污染物(NO2、NOx、PM10)与蛛网膜下腔出血存在显著关联,也未发现空气污染物(NO2、NOx、PM2.5、PM10)与脑出血、缺血性脑卒中存在显著关联。

结论

本研究未发现遗传预测的常见空气污染物(NO2、NOx、PM2.5、PM10)暴露与缺血性脑卒中、脑出血及蛛网膜下腔出血存在稳健的整体人群因果关联,但PM2.5与蛛网膜下腔出血存在名义相关信号,该信号主要由一个离群SNP驱动,提示该遗传变异可能作为效应修饰因子参与基因-环境交互作用。

Objective

To assess whether there are causal associations between four air pollutants [nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and inhalable particulate matter (PM10)] and the risk of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Methods

A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach was employed. Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with air pollutants such as NO2, NOx, PM2.5, and PM10 were used as instrumental variables, with summary data sourced from the UK Biobank database. Data for ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage were obtained from the MEGASTROKE project, the International Stroke Genetics Consortium, and the dataset of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with European populations in the 2020 genome-wide association study, respectively. The primary analysis method was the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method, with sensitivity analyses conducted using the simple median, weighted median, MR-Egger regression, leave-one-out and MR-PRESSO methods.

Results

The random-effects IVW analysis showed a nominal association between PM2.5 and subarachnoid hemorrhage, but the confidence interval was wide (OR=5.75, 95%CI: 1.13 – 29.20, P=0.035). After Bonferroni correction, this nominal association was no longer statistically significant. Further sensitivity analyses using MR-PRESSO and leave-one-out methods identified an outlier SNP; after correction for this outlier, the effect estimate substantially decreased and lost statistical significance (OR=2.05, 95%CI: 0.98 – 4.29, P=0.069). No associations were observed between subarachnoid hemorrhage and other air pollutants (NO2, NOx, and PM10), and no significant associations were found between any air pollutants and intracerebral hemorrhage or ischemic stroke.

Conclusion

This study found no robust causal association between genetically predicted exposure to common air pollutants (NO2, NOx, PM2.5, and PM10) and the risk of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. The nominally significant association between PM2.5 and subarachnoid hemorrhage was largely driven by an outlier SNP, the signal was mainly driven by an outlier SNP, suggesting hat this genetic variant may act as an effect modifier in gene-environment interactions.

表1 基于GWAS的暴露及结局数据总结
图1 空气污染与脑卒中亚型发生风险之间的孟德尔随机化分析假设 注:为不通过这条通路发挥作用
表2 空气污染物与脑卒中亚型孟德尔随机化分析工具变量的R2F
表3 不同分析方法检验空气污染与脑卒中发生风险的关系
表4 空气污染与脑卒中亚型的孟德尔随机化结果
暴露 结局 方法 SNP N OR值(95%CI) P
NO2 AIS 简单中位数法 95 0.87(0.64,1.19) 0.388
NO2 AIS 加权中位数法 95 0.97(0.70,1.33) 0.828
NO2 AIS MR-Egger回归 95 1.16(0.68,1.99) 0.592
NO2 AIS 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 95 1.07(0.87,1.32) 0.524
NO2 ICH 简单中位数法 49 0.78(0.09,6.96) 0.826
NO2 ICH 加权中位数法 49 1.00(0.13,8.01) 0.997
NO2 ICH MR-Egger回归 49 0.07(0,6.81) 0.263
NO2 ICH 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 49 0.91(0.22,3.77) 0.892
NO2 SAH 简单中位数法 49 1.03(0.38,2.79) 0.960
NO2 SAH 加权中位数法 49 1.03(0.38,2.85) 0.949
NO2 SAH MR-Egger回归 49 1.94(0.18,20.61) 0.586
NO2 SAH 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 49 0.65(0.31,1.33) 0.237
NOx AIS 简单中位数法 73 1.15(0.83,1.60) 0.406
NOx AIS 加权中位数法 73 1.15(0.81,1.62) 0.438
NOx AIS MR-Egger回归 73 0.63(0.31,1.27) 0.200
NOx AIS 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 73 1.17(0.93,1.48) 0.182
NOx ICH 简单中位数法 42 2.05(0.23,18.23) 0.519
NOx ICH 加权中位数法 42 2.31(0.28,18.92) 0.436
NOx ICH MR-Egger回归 42 1.10(0.01,204.59) 0.972
NOx ICH 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 42 1.19(0.26,5.44) 0.821
NOx SAH 简单中位数法 40 1.22(0.41,3.64) 0.723
NOx SAH 加权中位数法 40 1.22(0.40,3.75) 0.728
NOx SAH MR-Egger回归 40 0.18(0.01,4.98) 0.315
NOx SAH 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 40 0.68(0.30,1.51) 0.341
PM2.5 AIS 简单中位数法 56 0.94(0.65,1.35) 0.731
PM2.5 AIS 加权中位数法 56 0.97(0.66,1.42) 0.864
PM2.5 AIS MR-Egger回归 56 1.07(0.49,2.30) 0.870
PM2.5 AIS 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 56 1.07(0.82,1.38) 0.623
PM2.5 ICH 简单中位数法 26 9.41(0.68,131.11) 0.095
PM2.5 ICH 加权中位数法 26 12.5(0.81,192.49) 0.070
PM2.5 ICH MR-Egger回归 26 2.53(0,3405.40) 0.803
PM2.5 ICH 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 26 3.63(0.58,22.62) 0.167
PM2.5 SAH 简单中位数法 26 2.92(0.78,10.92) 0.112
PM2.5 SAH 加权中位数法 26 2.65(0.71,9.88) 0.147
PM2.5 SAH MR-Egger回归 26 1.33(0,1689.51) 0.939
PM2.5 SAH 逆方差加权法(随机效应模型) 26 5.75(1.13,29.20) 0.035
PM10 AIS 简单中位数法 224 1.04(0.84,1.30) 0.702
PM10 AIS 加权中位数法 224 1.04(0.84,1.30) 0.704
PM10 AIS MR-Egger回归 224 1.17(0.77,1.77) 0.457
PM10 AIS 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 224 1.10(0.95,1.27) 0.190
PM10 ICH 简单中位数法 102 1.27(0.28,5.80) 0.755
PM10 ICH 加权中位数法 102 1.46(0.31,6.80) 0.628
PM10 ICH MR-Egger回归 102 9.57(0.50,184.41) 0.138
PM10 ICH 逆方差加权法(固定效应模型) 102 1.13(0.41,3.12) 0.810
PM10 SAH 简单中位数法 90 0.83(0.37,1.87) 0.656
PM10 SAH 加权中位数法 90 0.76(0.35,1.67) 0.495
PM10 SAH MR-Egger回归 90 0.90(0.13,6.40) 0.918
PM10 SAH 逆方差加权法(随机效应模型) 90 0.96(0.51,1.81) 0.910
图2 空气污染与脑卒中发生风险的孟德尔随机化分析 注:NO2为二氧化氮;NOx为氮氧化物;PM2.5为细颗粒物;PM10为可吸入颗粒物;AIS为缺血性脑卒中;ICH为脑出血;SAH为蛛网膜下腔出血;SNP为单核苷酸多态性;IVW为逆方差加权法
1
Collaborators GBDRF. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 [J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10159): 1923-1994.
2
付佳钰, 于玲, 廖澍弘, 等. 2025年中国卒中临床转化研究重要进展巡礼 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 1-8.
3
Toubasi A, Al-Sayegh TN. Short-term exposure to air pollution and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Neurology, 2023, 101(19): e1922-e1932.
4
de Bont J, Pickford R, Åström C, et al. Mixtures of long-term exposure to ambient air pollution, built environment and temperature and stroke incidence across Europe [J]. Environ Int, 2023, 179: 108136.
5
Wang K, Yuan Y, Wang Q, et al. Incident risk and burden of cardiovascular diseases attributable to long-term NO2 exposure in Chinese adults [J]. Environ Int, 2023, 178: 108060.
6
Verhoeven JI, Allach Y, Vaartjes ICH, et al. Ambient air pollution and the risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke [J]. Lancet Planet Health, 2021, 5(8): e542-e552.
7
Ding R, Ren X, Sun Q, et al. Air pollution and stroke: an emerging challenge from cardio-cerebrovascular multimorbidity [J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2025, 14(13): e041848.
8
Tian Y, Liu H, Zhao Z, et al. Association between ambient air pollution and daily hospital admissions for ischemic stroke: a nationwide time-series analysis [J]. PLoS Med, 2018, 15(10): e1002668.
9
Huang K, Liang F, Yang X, et al. Long term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and incidence of stroke: prospective cohort study from the China-PAR project [J]. BMJ, 2019, 367: l6720.
10
卢剑峰, 王亚云, 王佳宁, 等. 心源性卒中危险因素的研究进展 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(6): 550-554.
11
Byrne CP, Bennett KE, Hickey A, et al. Short-term air pollution as a risk for stroke admission: a time-series analysis [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2020, 49(4): 404-411.
12
Sun S, Stewart JD, Eliot MN, et al. Short-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of stroke in the Women's Health Initiative [J]. Environ Int, 2019, 132: 105065.
13
Vivanco-Hidalgo RM, Wellenius GA, Basagaña X, et al. Short-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and ischemic stroke onset in Barcelona, Spain [J]. Environ Res, 2018, 162: 160-165.
14
Davey Smith G, Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies [J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2014, 23(R1): R89-R98.
15
Jiang F, Zhao J, Sun J, et al. Impact of ambient air pollution on colorectal cancer risk and survival: insights from a prospective cohort and epigenetic Mendelian randomization study [J]. EBioMedicine, 2024, 103: 105126.
16
Huang ZL, Huang ZH, Xie Y, et al. Inflammatory factors mediated the effect of air pollution on ischemic stroke: a two-step, mediation Mendelian randomization study [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2024, 28(5): 1959-1969.
17
Lyon MS, Andrews SJ, Elsworth B, et al. The variant call format provides efficient and robust storage of GWAS summary statistics [J]. Genome Biol, 2021, 22(1): 32.
18
Malik R, Chauhan G, Traylor M, et al. Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes [J]. Nat Genet, 2018, 50(4): 524-537.
19
Woo D, Falcone GJ, Devan WJ, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 1q22 as a susceptibility locus for intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2014, 94(4): 511-521.
20
Bakker MK, van der Spek RAA, van Rheenen W, et al. Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysms identifies 17 risk loci and genetic overlap with clinical risk factors [J]. Nat Genet, 2020, 52(12): 1303-1313.
21
Wu T, Wu Y, Jiang D, et al. SATB2, coordinated with CUX1, regulates IL-1beta-induced senescence-like phenotype in endothelial cells by fine-tuning the atherosclerosis-associated p16(INK4a) expression [J]. Aging Cell, 2023, 22(2): e13765.
22
Costa-Beber LC, Dantas RM, Peres AM, et al. The effects of direct and macrophage-mediated exposure to aqueous fine particulate matter on vascular endothelial dysfunction [J]. Environ Pollut, 2025, 376: 126407.
23
Chen PC, Sung FC, Mou CH, et al. A cohort study evaluating the risk of stroke associated with long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter in Taiwan [J]. Environ Health, 2022, 21(1): 43.
24
Zheng M, Yin Z, Wei J, et al. Submicron particle exposure and stroke hospitalization: an individual-level case-crossover study in Guangzhou, China, 2014-2018 [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 886: 163988.
25
Wang Y, Wang R, Peng Z, et al. A novel concern from two sample Mendelian randomization study: the effects of air pollution exposure on the cardiovascular, respiratory, and nervous system [J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2024, 284: 116871.
[1] 张行, 吕新文, 张超. 高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者气管切开时机及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 81-85.
[2] 严友杰, 王武昌, 李方宝, 魏民, 张恒柱, 王晓东. 基底节脑出血患者术后形成下肢深静脉血栓的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 86-91.
[3] 王睿, 罗永川, 廖可立, 陈贵军. 老年脑出血患者术后营养不良的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 92-97.
[4] 谭金梅, 吴珊. 偏头痛与癫痫:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 71-76.
[5] 满逸迪, 李军. 脑卒中后肢体运动功能恢复风险预测模型的构建与评估[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 84-91.
[6] 刘云卫, 余程冬. 功能性近红外光谱成像技术在脑卒中后非运动功能障碍康复中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 116-121.
[7] 刘诗馨, 宋晓微, 武剑. 临床视角下人工智能赋能脑卒中康复的范式重塑[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 231-239.
[8] 朱恩俊儒, 程畅, 贺玉琴, 姚笛, 郝嘉欢, 汪明欢. 缺血性脑卒中患者的肌肉健康与类淋巴系统相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 258-265.
[9] 单子恒, 王帆, 马丽, 张涛, 邵丽. 头颈部CT血管成像联合头颅CT灌注成像评估急性缺血性脑卒中患者短期预后的效能[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 164-169.
[10] 霍俊艳, 朱翠婷, 何明月, 胡秀朝, 王韵. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者入院时营养风险的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 170-177.
[11] 王红蕊, 江倩, 穆长青, 李响, 耿晓坤, 李凤武. 动力相关蛋白1介导线粒体裂变对缺血神经元泛凋亡的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 185-196.
[12] 曾凯声, 曹淯阳, 胡平, 鄢腾峰, 吴雁泽, 肖兵, 叶敏华, 吴淼经, 祝新根. 鞘内注射尿激酶治疗蛛网膜下腔出血的安全性及有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 197-203.
[13] 马吉辰, 王少松, 王雪飞, 姫旭, 刘桂林. 铁死亡在中医药治疗缺血性脑卒中中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 209-214.
[14] 尹晓欣, 于立敏. 脑心健康管理师在脑卒中患者健康管理中的实践研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 215-219.
[15] 宋文迪, 孙蔚, 宋海庆. 脑卒中后平衡障碍的发生机制及治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 111-118.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?