Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04): 337-343. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2023.04.006

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of patch carotid endarterectomy and eversion carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study of long-term follow-up

Yang Yang, Sheng Yan, Zuoguan Chen, Zhiyuan Wu, Yongpeng Diao, Qing Gao, Yuexin Chen, Yuehong Zheng, Yongjun Li()   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
    Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China
    Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2022-12-19 Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-09-12
  • Contact: Yongjun Li

Abstract:

Objective

To compare long-term outcomes of patch carotid endarterectomy (p-CEA) and eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA).

Methods

In a retrospective study, data on 340 patients (372 operations, p-CEA=193, e-CEA=179) who underwent carotid endarterectomy were collected between October 2009 and October 2015 in the Vascular Surgery Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The long-term incidence of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, ipsilateral stroke, and recurrence of symptoms were compared between two groups during follow-up.

Results

The comparison of baseline results showed that the proportion of patients with hyperlipidemia in the p-CEA group was higher than that in the e-CEA group (46.1% vs 34.6%, P=0.032). During a maximum follow-up period of 133 months, there was no statistical difference between the p-CEA group and the e-CEA group in mortality (17.8% vs 13.8%, P=0.4855), myocardial infarction (7.8% vs 5.9%, P=0.360), stroke (12.8% vs 15.6%, P=0.228), ipsilateral stroke (4.3% vs 5.9%, P=0.282), and recurrence of symptoms (χ2=0.198, df=15.622, P=0.85).Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in postoperative restenosis and postoperative death at year 6 between e-CEA and p-CEA groups (P=0.87; P=0.18), and postoperative death and stroke at year 8 between e-CEA and p-CEA groups (P=0.34; P=0.24).

Conclusion

The adverse event rates in long-term follow-up showed no significant difference between the e-CEA and p-CEA groups. Both e-CEA and p-CEA are effective for carotid artery stenosis.

Key words: Carotid endarterectomy, patch, eversion, Carotid artery stenosis, Long-term death

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 01082266456, 15611963912, 15611963911 E-mail: zhnxgbzzbysy@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd