切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 19 -24. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9248.2025.01.004

临床研究

脑心健康管理师主导的认知行为疗法对脑卒中后焦虑、抑郁的影响
张丽华1,(), 张炜1, 薛海丽1, 朱向阳1   
  1. 1. 226000 江苏南通,南通大学附属第二医院 南通市第一人民医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-27 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 张丽华
  • 基金资助:
    南通市2022社会民生面上项目(MS2022121)

Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy led by brain and heart health managers on anxiety and depression after stroke

Lihua Zhang1,(), Wei Zhang1, Haili Xue1, Xiangyang Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong First People's Hospital, Nantong 226000, China
  • Received:2024-11-27 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Lihua Zhang
引用本文:

张丽华, 张炜, 薛海丽, 朱向阳. 脑心健康管理师主导的认知行为疗法对脑卒中后焦虑、抑郁的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-24.

Lihua Zhang, Wei Zhang, Haili Xue, Xiangyang Zhu. Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy led by brain and heart health managers on anxiety and depression after stroke[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 19-24.

目的

研究脑心健康管理师主导的认知行为疗法对脑卒中后并发轻中度焦虑、抑郁患者的影响。

方法

采用便利抽样法,将2023年6月至12月南通市第一人民医院神经内科收治的脑卒中后并发轻中度焦虑、抑郁患者98例纳入研究,其中神经内科一区住院的49例患者作为对照组,神经内科二区住院的49例患者作为干预组。对照组实施常规治疗、护理及心理干预,干预组在常规护理基础上实施以脑心健康管理师主导的基于网络的认知行为疗法。采用t检验比较2组在干预前与干预3个月后汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、健康状况调查简表(SF-36)评分、生活自理能力(BI)评分的差异。

结果

干预后干预组HAMA评分、HAMD评分均低于对照组[(7.83±4.85)分vs(9.08±4.58)分;(8.26±3.04)分vs(9.28±4.67)分],干预组SF-36评分、BI评分均高于对照组[(498.00±31.02)分vs(438.41±28.68)分;(80.11±3.35)分vs(70.23±3.01)分],差异均具有统计学意义(t=1.023、2.672、-9.378、-15.765,P均<0.001)。

结论

脑心健康管理师主导下的基于网络的认知行为疗法能减轻患者焦虑、抑郁症状,提高患者的生理和心理健康、生活自理能力,最终提高其生活质量。

Objective

To investigate the impact of cognitive behavioral therapy led by brainheart health management specialists on patients with mild to moderate anxiety and depression following stroke.

Methods

A convenience sampling method was employed to include 98 patients with mild to moderate anxiety and depression after stroke admitted to the Department of Neurology at Nantong First People's Hospital from June to December 2023. Among them, 49 patients admitted to the first ward of the neurology department were assigned to the control group, while 49 patients admitted to the second ward were assigned to the observation group. The control group received conventional treatment, care, and psychological intervention, whereas the observation group received additional internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy led by brain-heart health management specialists. Pre- and post-intervention differences in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) scores, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores, Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)scores, and Barthel Index (BI) scores were compared between the two groups using t-tests.

Results

After the intervention, the HAMA and HAMD scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group [(7.83±4.85) vs (9.08±4.58); (8.26±3.04) vs (9.28±4.67)], and the SF-36 and BI scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group [(498.00±31.02) vs (438.41±28.68); (80.11±3.35)vs (70.23±3.01)], with all differences being statistically significant (t=1.023, 2.672, -9.378, -15.765, all P<0.001).

Conclusion

Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy led by brain-heart health management specialists is effective in alleviating anxiety and depression symptoms in stroke patients. It also improves their physical and mental health, self-care ability, and overall quality of life.

表1 2组轻中度焦虑、抑郁的脑卒中患者一般临床资料比较(例)
表2 2组轻中度焦虑、抑郁的脑卒中患者干预前后HAMA、HAMD、SF-36、BI得分比较(分,±s)
1
常红, 张素, 范凯婷, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓护理指南 [J].中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(1): 10-15.
2
孙迪, 吴人照, 汪亚群, 等. 生物信息反馈红外治疗仪联合康复训练对缺血性脑卒中后偏瘫临床疗效观察 [J]. 中华中医药刊, 2020,38(7): 97-100.
3
Li XM, Bian D, Li M, et al. Construction of simulation platform for Chinese stroke economic burden based on the national screening data [J].Stud Health Technol Inform, 2019, 264: 979-982.
4
Liu L, Xu M, Marshall IJ, et al. Prevalence and natural history of depression after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies [J]. PLoS Med, 2023, 20(3): e1004200.
5
Mahadevan S, Chan MF, Moghadas M, et al. Post-stroke psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in West Asia, South Asia and Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J ClinMed, 2021, 10(16):3655.
6
张鹏博, 梅永霞, 张振香, 等. 脑卒中患者焦虑症状潜在剖面影响因素分析 [J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 12-17.
7
Sawchuk CN, Craner JR. Evidence-based psychotherapy in primary care [J]. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ), 2017, 15(3): 264-270.
8
Curtiss JE, Levine DS, Ander I, et al. Cognitive-behavioral treatments for anxiety and stress-related disorders [J]. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ),2021, 19(2): 184-189.
9
Thase ME, Kingdon D, Turkington D. The promise of cognitive behavior therapy for treatment of severe mental disorders: a review of recent developments [J]. World Psychiatry, 2014, 13(3): 244-250.
10
潘明月, 赵佳鑫, 黄海群, 等.网络化认知行为疗法在乳腺癌患者中的研究进展 [J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(3): 363-367.
11
周小莉, 钱嘉璐, 吴孟玮, 等. 基于认知行为疗法的护理干预在胎儿异常引产产妇中的应用研究 [J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(14):1676-1682.
12
Andersson G, Carlbring P. Internet-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy [J]. Psychiatr Clin North Am, 2017, 40(4): 689-700.
13
乔梦婷. 脑心健康管理师主导的急性缺血性脑卒中患者二级预防管理方案的构建及初步验证 [D]. 上海: 中国人民解放军海军军医大学, 2024.
14
杨彩侠, 刘延锦, 郭园丽, 等. 脑心健康管理师主导的缺血性卒中患者全流程健康管理 [J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(21): 36-39.
15
邓兰兰, 张燕, 李春玲. 认知行为疗法对社区2型糖尿病伴轻中度焦虑抑郁患者情绪干预效果研究 [J]. 中国健康教育, 2024, 40(7):647-651.
16
孟庆霞. 应激心理干预对有机磷中毒并呼吸衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪及自我效能的影响 [J]. 中华灾害救援医学, 2021, 9(2): 794-797.
17
脑认知健康管理中国专家共识制定委员会, 《中华健康管理学杂志》编辑委员会. 脑认知健康管理中国专家共识(2023) [J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2023, 17(12): 881-892.
18
Rodriguez-Seijas C, Thompson JS, Diehl JM, et al. A comparison of the dimensionality of the Hamilton Rating Scale for anxiety and the DSM-5 Anxious-Distress Specifier Interview [J]. Psychiatry Res,2020, 284: 112788.
19
Gandy M, Woldhuis T, Wu W, et al. Cognitive behavioral interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Psychol Med, 2024, 54(12):1-14.
20
宋琼, 马志辉, 郝习君, 等. 视听嗅触多感官刺激训练改善脑卒中后患者焦虑、抑郁和生活质量的效果 [J]. 军事护理, 2023, 40(1): 57-60.
21
Lo SHS, Chau JPC, Lam SKY, et al. Understanding the priorities in life beyond the first year after stroke: qualitative findings and nonparticipant observations of stroke survivors and service providers [J].Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2022, 1: 27.
22
Lo SHS, Chau JPC, Chang AM. Strategies adopted to manage physical and psychosocial challenges after returning home among people with stroke [J]. Medicine (Baltim), 2021, 100(10): e25026.
23
Sakakibara BM, Lear SA, Barr SI, et al. Telehealth coaching to improve self-management for secondary prevention after stroke: a randomized controlled trial of stroke coach [J]. Int J Stroke, 2022,17(4): 455-464.
24
金婕, 钟美容, 于秀婷, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者中医延续性护理方案的构建与应用研究 [J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8): 1125-1132.
25
赵娅欣, 贺润莲. 移动平台在我国脑卒中患者延续护理中的应用现状及发展趋势 [J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020, 26(36): 5125-5130.
26
Health Quality Ontario. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for major depression and anxiety disorders: a health technology assessment [J]. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, 2019,19(6): 1-199.
[1] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[2] 陈靖, 刘天奇, 王莉莉, 尹立全. 体外冲击波治疗脑卒中后肌痉挛的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 334-340.
[3] 昝兴淳, 许季祥, 何鹏, 齐胤良, 周小妹. 通督调神针刺联合吞咽治疗仪治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 346-352.
[4] 李娇娇, 回雪, 杨美荣, 周红军. 穴位电刺激联合中药脐部热熨辅助治疗脑卒中后便秘患者的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 69-72.
[5] 侯志博, 李秋璇, 逯瑶, 张苗, 於帆, 卢洁. 多延迟动脉自旋标记成像与CT灌注成像在急性缺血性脑卒中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(12): 1090-1096.
[6] 白杰, 王唯一, 陈超, 王帆, 肖新如. 神经外科住培医师职业倦怠及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 662-670.
[7] 吉训明. 卒中防治现状和“百万减残”国家战略方向[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-80.
[8] 吉训明. 国家脑卒中防治与百万减残工程工作进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-5.
[9] 李小勇, 郭海志, 赵洋. QSM 联合SWI 预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者EVT 后神经功能的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 549-555.
[10] 吴婷婷, 张薇, 何雅琪, 沈海清, 路敬叶, 张艳. 老年缺血性脑卒中患者早发型卒中后认知障碍发生情况及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 573-579.
[11] 王祥卫, 李勋, 赵峰, 徐佳, 曹嘉雯. 超声测得视神经鞘直径及其与眼球横径比值对急性出血性脑卒中患者预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 580-585.
[12] 江倩, 王红蕊, 朱玥荃, 李响, 耿晓坤, 李凤武. 药物诱导亚低温对缺血性脑卒中的神经保护作用及DRP-1 调控线粒体功能在其中的潜在分子机制[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 586-594.
[13] 赵媛媛, 关欣, 欧梦仙, 王军. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血一体化急救护理的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-605.
[14] 金小娟, 马晓瑭. 血管内皮细胞来源胞外囊泡在缺血性脑卒中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 621-629.
[15] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要