| 1 |
Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Duckwiler G, et al. Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils[J]. J Neurosurg, 1992, 77(4): 515-524.
|
| 2 |
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2 143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366(9488): 809-817.
|
| 3 |
Spetzler RF, Mcdougall CG, Albuquerque FC, et al. The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial: 3-year results[J]. J Neurosurg, 2013, 119(1): 146-157.
|
| 4 |
Johnston SC, Zhao S, Dudley RA, et al. Treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in california[J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(3): 597-605.
|
| 5 |
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9378): 103-110.
|
| 6 |
Adamou A, Alexandrou M, Roth C, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Life Basel Switz, 2021, 11(4): 335.
|
| 7 |
Musmar B, Adeeb N, Ansari J, et al. Endovascular management of hemorrhagic stroke[J]. Biomedicines, 2022, 10(1): 100.
|
| 8 |
Gan CL, Yang Z, Salahia G, et al. A single-centre experience and literature review of flow Re-directional endoluminal device (FRED) in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Clin Radiol, 2021, 76(3): 238.e1-238.e8.
|
| 9 |
White TG, Shah K, Turpin J, et al. Technical aspects of combined intrasaccular and endoluminal flow diversion[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2021, 27(3): 346-352.
|
| 10 |
White TG, Shah K, Turpin J, et al. WEB embolization of very broad-based intracranial aneurysms with a dome-to-neck ratio ≤ 1.1[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2021, 27(3): 346-352.
|
| 11 |
Gajera J, Maingard J, Foo M, et al. The woven EndoBridge device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial clinical experience within an Australian population[J]. Neurointervention, 2022, 17(1): 28-36.
|
| 12 |
Chen JA, Mirshahi S, Jeelani Y, et al. Delayed rupture of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm after elective woven endobridge embolization, re-treated with microsurgical clipping: operative technique and systematic review[J]. World Neurosurg, 2022, 165: 188-197. e1.
|
| 13 |
Goertz L, Liebig T, Siebert E, et al. Intrasaccular flow disruption with the woven EndoBridge for narrow-necked aneurysms: a safety and feasibility study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 151: e278-e285.
|
| 14 |
Mouchtouris N, Hasan D, Samaniego EA, et al. The woven EndoBridge (WEB) device: feasibility, techniques, and outcomes after FDA approval[J]. J Neurosurg, 2021, 136(5): 1266-1272.
|
| 15 |
Pagano P, Paiusan L, Soize S, et al. Intracranial aneurysm treatment with intrasaccular flow disruption: comparison of WEB-21 and WEB-17 systems[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(9): 904-909.
|
| 16 |
Van Rooij S, Sprengers ME, Peluso JP, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2020, 26(4): 455-460.
|
| 17 |
König I, Maurer C, Berlis A, et al. Treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms with WEB 17 versus WEB 21 systems : comparison of indications and early angiographic outcomes[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2021, 31(3): 691-697.
|
| 18 |
Zimmer S, Maus V, Maurer C, et al. Widening the indications for intrasaccular flow disruption: WEB 17 in the treatment of aneurysm locations different from those in the good clinical practice trials[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2021, 42(3): 524-529.
|
| 19 |
Spelle L, Costalat V, Caroff J, et al. CLinical EValuation of WEB 17 device in intracranial aneuRysms (CLEVER): procedural, 30-day and 1-year safety results for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2023: jnis-2023-20866.
|
| 20 |
Bhogal P, Udani S, Cognard C, et al. Endosaccular flow disruption: where are we now?[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(10): 1024-1025.
|
| 21 |
Roumia S. [woven-EndoBridge (WEB) as an intrasaccular method of aneurysm occlusion][J]. Radiologe, 2020, 60(4): 310-316.
|
| 22 |
Narsinh KH, Travis Caton M, Mahmood NF, et al. Intrasaccular flow disruption (WEB) of a large wide-necked basilar apex aneurysm using PulseRider-assistance[J]. Interdiscip Neurosurg, 2021, 24: 101072.
|
| 23 |
Goertz L, Liebig T, Siebert E, et al. Oversizing of the woven EndoBridge for treatment of intracranial aneurysms improves angiographic results (WEBINAR)[J]. World Neurosurg, 2024, 181: e182-e191.
|
| 24 |
Amuluru K, Al-Mufti F, Sahlein DH, et al. Adjustment of malpositioned woven EndoBridge device using gooseneck snare: complication management technique[J]. Neurointervention, 2021, 16(3): 275-279.
|
| 25 |
Daubé P, Cagnazzo F, Barreau X, et al. Influence of operator experience on the technical and clinical results of woven EndoBridge endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2021, 208: 106900.
|
| 26 |
Dmytriw AA, Salem MM, Yang VXD, et al. Endosaccular flow disruption: a new frontier in endovascular aneurysm management[J]. Neurosurgery, 2020, 86(2): 170-181.
|
| 27 |
Gravino G, Masri S, Chandran A, et al. Management of WEB device migration and mal-position in endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2022: 15910199221122857. Online ahead of print.
|
| 28 |
Cherian J, Chen SR, Puri A, et al. Postmarket american experience with woven EndoBridge device: adjudicated multicenter case series[J]. Neurosurgery, 2021, 89(2): 275-282.
|
| 29 |
Moore KA, Goyal N, Arthur AS. The woven EndoBridge embolization device for the treatment of intracranial wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms[J]. Future Cardiol, 2021, 17(6): 953-961.
|
| 30 |
Heiferman DM, Goyal N, Inoa V, et al. A new era in the treatment of wide necked bifurcation aneurysms: intrasaccular flow disruption[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2024, 30(1): 31-36.
|
| 31 |
Goertz L, Liebig T, Siebert E, et al. Treatment of proximal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms by intrasaccular flow disruption: a multicenter experience[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2022, 43(8): 1158-1163.
|
| 32 |
Simgen A, Weyrich A, Dietrich P, et al. Treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms using the WEB device including flow alteration assessment with color-coded imaging: a single center experience[J]. World Neurosurg X, 2022, 17: 100143.
|
| 33 |
Murphy H, Scally A, Andrew D, et al. Clinical audit comparing radiation dose metrics between WEB and coil embolisation in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci, 2022, 53(1): 75-80.
|
| 34 |
Van Rooij S, Van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, et al. The woven EndoBridge (WEB) for recurrent aneurysms: clinical and imaging results[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2019, 25(1): 21-26.
|
| 35 |
Piotin M, Biondi A, Sourour N, et al. The LUNA aneurysm embolization system for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short-term, mid-term and long-term clinical and angiographic results[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 10(12): e34.
|
| 36 |
Hecker C, Broussalis E, Griessenauer CJ, et al. A mini-review of intrasaccular flow diverters[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2023, 15(1): 70-74.
|
| 37 |
Rajah G, Narayanan S, Rangel-Castilla L. Update on flow diverters for the endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 42(6): E2.
|
| 38 |
Turk AS, Maia O, Ferreira CC, et al. Periprocedural safety of aneurysm embolization with the medina coil system: the early human experience[J]. J. Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 8(2): 168-172.
|
| 39 |
Aguilar Perez M, Bhogal P, Martinez Moreno R, et al. The medina embolic device: early clinical experience from a single center[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2017, 9(1): 77-87.
|
| 40 |
Akhunbay-Fudge CY, Deniz K, Tyagi AK, et al. Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the novel contour neurovascular system: a single-center safety and feasibility study[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2020, 12(10): 987-992.
|
| 41 |
Biondi A, Primikiris P, Vitale G, et al. Endosaccular flow disruption with the Contour Neurovascular System: angiographic and clinical results in a single-center study of 60 unruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2023, 15(9): 838-843.
|
| 42 |
Hecker C, Broussalis E, Pfaff JAR, et al. Comparison of the contour neurovascular system and woven EndoBridge device for treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms at a bifurcation or sidewall[J]. J Neurosurg, 2023, 139(2): 563-572.
|
| 43 |
Ghozy S, Lashin BI, Elfil M, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the contour neurovascular system for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of early experience[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2022: 15910199221139546.
|
| 44 |
Mostafa K, Bueno Neves F, Gärtner F, et al. Contour device implantation versus coil embolization for treatment of narrow neck intracranial aneurysms[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 4904.
|
| 45 |
Russo R, Molinaro S, Bergui M. Cerus endovascular contour neurovascular system protrusion into parent artery successfully managed with post-detachment bail-out PTA[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2023, 33(2): 561-564.
|
| 46 |
Liebig T, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Gal G, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the contour neurovascular system (contour) for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: the CERUS study[J]. Neurosurgery, 2022, 90(3): 270-277.
|
| 47 |
Korte J, Gaidzik F, Larsen N, et al. In vitro and in silico assessment of flow modulation after deploying the contour neurovascular system in intracranial aneurysm models[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2024, 16(8): 815-823.
|
| 48 |
Liebig T, Gal G, Kelly CO, et al. Neqstent coil-assisted flow diverter (NQS) for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: the coil-assisted flow diversion safety and performance study (CAFI)[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2024, 16(7): 721-725.
|
| 49 |
Diana F, De Dios Lascuevas M, Peschillo S, et al. Intrasaccular flow disruptor-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms using the novel contour neurovascular systems and NEQSTENT: a single-center safety and feasibility study[J]. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(8): 991.
|
| 50 |
Zoppo CT, Kolstad JW, King RM, et al. A novel intrasaccular aneurysm device with high complete occlusion rate: initial results in a rabbit model[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2024, 16(9): 928-933.
|
| 51 |
Pierot L, Gubucz I, Buhk JH, et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017, 38(6): 1151-1155.
|
| 52 |
Pierot L, Costalat V, Moret J, et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study[J]. J Neurosurg, 2016, 124(5): 1250-1256.
|
| 53 |
Pierot L, Spelle L, Molyneux A, et al. Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and french observatory)[J]. Neurosurgery, 2016, 78(1): 133-141.
|
| 54 |
林建华, 孔祥杰, 许璟. WEB瘤内扰流装置治疗颅内宽颈分叉部动脉瘤的效果观察[J]. 心电与循环, 2023, 42(4): 389-392.
|