切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑血管病杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 556 -564. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9248.2026.05.011

基础研究

miR-186-5p调控对缺血性脑卒中小鼠神经功能的影响
黄雨威1, 石新华1,†(), 束秉钧2   
  1. 1 430014 湖北武汉,武汉市中医医院药学部
    2 430014 湖北武汉,武汉市中医医院心血管病科
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-27 出版日期:2026-10-01
  • 通信作者: 石新华
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省中医药管理局中医药科研项目(ZY2025Q002)

Effect of miR-186-5p regulation on the neurological function of mice with ischemic stroke

Yuwei Huang1, Xinhua Shi1,†(), Bingjun Shu2   

  1. 1 Department of Pharmacy, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430014, China
    2 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430014, China
  • Received:2026-04-27 Published:2026-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xinhua Shi
引用本文:

黄雨威, 石新华, 束秉钧. miR-186-5p调控对缺血性脑卒中小鼠神经功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 556-564.

Yuwei Huang, Xinhua Shi, Bingjun Shu. Effect of miR-186-5p regulation on the neurological function of mice with ischemic stroke[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 556-564.

目的

探讨miR-186-5p调控沉默信息调节因子1/过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ共激活因子1α/Ⅲ型纤连蛋白结构域蛋白5(SIRT1/PGC-1α/FNDC5)信号通路对缺血性脑卒中(IS)小鼠神经功能的影响。

方法

通过大脑中动脉闭塞(MCAO)的方法构建IS小鼠模型,并将小鼠分为模型组、阴性对照组、miR-186-5p抑制剂组、依达拉奉组、miR-186-5p抑制剂+SIRT1抑制剂(EX527)组,每组10只;另取10只小鼠作为假手术组,除不插入线栓外,其余操作同IS小鼠模型。使用Longa评分系统评估神经功能,使用苏木精-伊红(HE)染色及尼氏染色观察神经损伤情况,使用免疫荧光法检测神经元特异性核蛋白(NeuN)和离子化钙结合衔接分子1(Iba-1)的表达情况,使用逆转录聚合酶链反应检测miR-186-5p和Sirt1 mRNA的表达水平,使用蛋白质印迹法检测SIRT1/PGC-1α/FNDC5通路相关蛋白的表达水平,使用双荧光素酶基因报告实验验证靶向关系。2组间的计量资料比较采用独立样本t检验。多组间的计量资料比较采用单因素方差分析,进一步两两比较采用SNK-q检验。

结果

miR-186-5p抑制剂组、依达拉奉组、miR-186-5p抑制剂+EX527组、阴性对照组、模型组和假手术组小鼠的Longa评分分别为(0.86±0.10)、(0.82±0.10)、(1.85±0.22)、(2.09±0.23)、(2.15±0.26)和(0±0)分,SIRT1蛋白相对表达水平分别为0.77±0.08、0.81±0.09、0.49±0.05、0.51±0.06、0.48±0.05和0.85±0.10,PGC-1α蛋白相对表达水平分别为0.51±0.06、0.59±0.06、0.33±0.04、0.29±0.03、0.24±0.03和0.61±0.07,FNDC5蛋白相对表达水平分别为1.11±0.12、1.18±0.12、0.71±0.08、0.69±0.08、0.61±0.07和1.24±0.13;miR-186-5p抑制剂组和阴性对照组的上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(q=22.519、11.070、13.688、12.921,P均<0.001);miR-186-5p抑制剂+EX527组小鼠的上述指标与miR-186-5p抑制剂组小鼠比较,差异均有统计学意义(q=18.125、11.921、11.199、12.305,P均<0.001)。模型组小鼠的NeuN阳性细胞数、Sirt1 mRNA相对表达水平和神经细胞数均显著低于假手术组小鼠,Iba-1阳性细胞数和miR-186-5p相对表达水平均显著高于假手术组小鼠,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);miR-186-5p抑制剂组和依达拉奉组小鼠的NeuN阳性细胞数、Sirt1 mRNA相对表达水平和神经细胞数均显著高于阴性对照组小鼠,Iba-1阳性细胞数和miR-186-5p表达水平均显著低于阴性对照组小鼠,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);miR-186-5p抑制剂+EX527组小鼠的NeuN阳性细胞数、Sirt1 mRNA相对表达水平和神经细胞数均显著低于miR-186-5p抑制剂组小鼠,Iba-1阳性细胞数显著高于miR-186-5p抑制剂组小鼠,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。

结论

抑制miR-186-5p表达可以改善IS小鼠的神经功能,其机制与靶向调节SIRT1/PGC-1α/FNDC5通路有关。

Objective

To investigate the effect of miR-186-5p regulation of the silent information regulator 1/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α/fibronectin type Ⅲ domain-containing protein 5 (SIRT1/PGC-1α/FNDC5) pathway on the neurological function of mice with ischemic stroke (IS).

Methods

An IS mouse model was established using the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) method, and mice were divided into five groups: model group, negative control group, miR-186-5p inhibitor group, edaravone group, and miR-186-5p inhibitor + SIRT1 inhibitor (EX527) group, with 10 mice in each group. Additionally, 10 mice were used as a sham operation group, undergoing the same procedures as the IS model group except for the absence of filament insertion. The neurological function was evaluated using the Longa scoring system; the condition of nerve injury was observed by hematoxylin-eosin and Nissl staining; the expression of neuron-specific nuclear protein (NeuN) and ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba-1) was analyzed by immunofluorescence; the expression levels of miR-186-5p and Sirt1 mRNA were detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; the expression levels of proteins related to the SIRT1/PGC-1α/FNDC5 pathway were detected by Western blotting; and the targeting relationship was verified by dual-luciferase reporter assay. The independent samples t-test was used to compare the measurement data between the two groups; one-way ANOVA was used to compare the measurement data among multiple groups, and the SNK-q test was used for further pairwise comparisons.

Results

The Longa scores of the miR-186-5p inhibitor group, the edaravone group, the miR-186-5p inhibitor + EX527 group, the negative control group, the model group, and the sham operation group were 0.86±0.10, 0.82±0.10, 1.85±0.22, 2.09±0.23, 2.15±0.26, and 0±0, respectively; the relative expression levels of SIRT1 protein were 0.77±0.08, 0.81±0.09, 0.49±0.05, 0.51±0.06, 0.48±0.05, and 0.85±0.10, respectively; the relative expression levels of PGC-1α protein were 0.51±0.06, 0.59±0.06, 0.33±0.04, 0.29±0.03, 0.24±0.03, and 0.61±0.07, respectively; the relative expression levels of FNDC5 protein were 1.11±0.12, 1.18±0.12, 0.71±0.08, 0.69±0.08, 0.61±0.07, and 1.24±0.13, respectively. The differences in the above indicators between the miR-186-5p inhibitor group and the negative control group were statistically significant (q=22.519, 11.070, 13.688, 12.921; all P<0.001). The differences in the above indicators between the miR-186-5p inhibitor + EX527 group and the miR-186-5p inhibitor group were also statistically significant (q=18.125, 11.921, 11.199, 12.305; all P<0.001). The number of NeuN-positive cells, the relative expression level of Sirt1 mRNA, and the number of nerve cells in the model group were significantly lower than those in the sham operation group, and the number of Iba-1-positive cells and the relative expression level of miR-186-5p in the model group were significantly higher than those in the sham operation group (all P<0.05). The number of NeuN-positive cells, the relative expression level of Sirt1 mRNA, and the number of nerve cells in the miR-186-5p inhibitor group and the edaravone group were significantly higher than those in the negative control group, while the number of Iba-1-positive cells and the expression level of miR-186-5p were significantly lower than those in the negative control group (all P<0.05). The number of NeuN-positive cells, the relative expression level of Sirt1 mRNA, and the number of nerve cells in the miR-186-5p inhibitor + EX527 group were significantly lower than those in the miR-186-5p inhibitor group, while the number of Iba-1-positive cells was significantly higher than that in the miR-186-5p inhibitor group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Inhibition of miR-186-5p expression improves neurological function in IS mice, and the underlying mechanism is associated with targeted regulation of the SIRT1/PGC-1α/FNDC5 signaling pathway.

表1 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠Longa评分的影响(分,
±s)
图1 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠脑组织神经病理损伤的影响(×200) 注:HE为苏木精-伊红;A为假手术组;B为模型组;C为阴性对照组;D为miR-186-5p抑制剂组;E为依达拉奉组;F为miR-186-5p抑制剂+EX527组
表2 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠脑组织中神经细胞数的影响(个,
±s)
图2 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠脑组织中神经元特异性核蛋白(NeuN)和离子化钙结合衔接分子1(Iba-1)表达的影响(×200) 注:A为假手术组;B为模型组;C为阴性对照组;D为miR-186-5p抑制剂组;E为依达拉奉组;F为miR-186-5p抑制剂+EX527组
表3 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠脑组织中NeuN和Iba-1阳性表达细胞数的影响(个,
±s)
表4 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠脑组织中miR-186-5p和Sirt1 mRNA表达水平比较(
±s)
图3 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠脑组织中沉默信息调节因子1(SIRT1)、过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ共激活因子1α(PGC-1α)和Ⅲ型纤连蛋白结构域蛋白5(FNDC5)蛋白表达的影响 注:A为假手术组;B为模型组;C为阴性对照组;D为miR-186-5p抑制剂组;E为依达拉奉组;F为miR-186-5p抑制剂+EX527组
表5 miR-186-5p对各组缺血性脑卒中小鼠脑组织中SIRT1、PGC-1α和FNDC5蛋白表达的影响(
±s)
图4 数据库预测miR-186-5p和沉默信息调节因子1(Sirt1)的碱基结合位点
表6 各组转染细胞的荧光素酶活性变化(
±s)
1
Li Z, He M, Wang K, et al. Suhexiang pills inhibit ischemia stroke via targeting miR-24-3p to promote the activation of Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway [J]. Brain Res Bull, 2025, 230(1): 111478-111487.
2
梁文雯, 李征, 万敏, 等. 急性缺血性卒中再灌注治疗后出血转化的研究进展 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(1): 71-80.
3
Xue LX, Shu LY, Wang HM, et al. miR-181b promotes angiogenesis and neurological function recovery after ischemic stroke [J]. Neural Regen Res, 2023, 18(9): 1983-1989.
4
Ni G, Kou L, Duan C, et al. MicroRNA-199a-5p attenuates blood-brain barrier disruption following ischemic stroke by regulating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19(9): e0306793.
5
You J, Qian F, Huang Y, et al. lncRNA WT1-AS attenuates hypoxia/ischemia-induced neuronal injury during cerebral ischemic stroke via miR-186-5p/XIAP axis [J]. Open Med (Wars), 2022, 17(1): 1338-1349.
6
Chen L, Chen S, Bai Y, et al. Electroacupuncture improves cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke based on regulation of mitochondrial dynamics through SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway [J]. Brain Res, 2024, 1844(1): 149139-149148.
7
顾卫佳, 鲍春蓉, 谢鸿宇, 等. 电针对局灶性脑缺血再灌注大鼠过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ辅激活因子1α、鸢尾素和脑源性神经营养因子的影响 [J]. 针刺研究, 2022, 47(5): 428-434.
8
邱莹, 黄翔, 吴迪, 等. 针刺调节miR-372-3p/TXNIP轴对缺血性脑卒中小鼠神经功能的影响研究 [J]. 中国中医急症, 2025, 34(9): 1456-1461.
9
彭晶晶, 李春花, 曾凯敏, 等. 基于Notch/核因子κB信号通路探讨大黄酸对脑缺血模型小鼠的保护作用 [J]. 解剖学报, 2025, 56(5): 541-547.
10
曹自为, 李传文, 刘学春, 等. 白藜芦醇通过SIRT1/FoxO1路径改善大鼠脑缺血/再灌注损伤机制研究 [J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2019, 54(5): 719-723.
11
罗婷, 邱令智, 易东, 等. 线粒体功能障碍与心血管疾病、缺血性脑卒中及慢性肾脏病关系的研究进展 [J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(1): 60-63.
12
Eyileten C, Wicik Z, Shahzadi A, et al. An integrative clinical and bioinformatic analysis identifies microRNAs as biomarkers of ischemic stroke severity [J]. Sci Rep, 2026, 16(1): 6242.
13
Chen NH, Ren JX, Li GJ, et al. MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in ischemic stroke from the perspective of inflammation [J]. Curr Neuropharmacol, 2026, 24(3): 348-363.
14
Ma X, Yun HJ, Elkin K, et al. MicroRNA-29b suppresses inflammation and protects blood-brain barrier integrity in ischemic stroke [J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2022, 2022: 1755416-1755425.
15
李普阳, 赵亚鹏, 王凯, 等. miR-186-5p基于JAK/STAT3通路对三叉神经痛模型大鼠胶质细胞活化的影响 [J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(8): 1925-1928.
16
Wang W, Hu Y, Zhang Y. FTX Attenuates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting apoptosis and oxidative stress via miR-186-5p/MDM4 pathway [J]. Neurotox Res, 2022, 40(2): 542-552.
17
Lai W, Nie J, Hong A, et al. Neuroprotective effects of Rosavin via HIF-1α signaling in a rat model of ischemic stroke [J]. Phytomedicine, 2025, 145(1): 157068-157077.
18
Gao Y, Wang J, Zhang C, et al. Poliumoside alleviates microglia-mediated inflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption via modulating the polarization of microglia after ischemic stroke in mice [J]. Phytomedicine, 2025, 143(1): 156881-156890.
19
Li G, Ma X, Zhao H, et al. Long non-coding RNA H19 promotes leukocyte inflammation in ischemic stroke by targeting the miR-29b/C1QTNF6 axis [J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2022, 28(6): 953-963.
20
Ota-Elliott RS, Fukui Y, Bian Y, et al. Neuroprotective effect of, a flavonoid, sudachitin in mice stroke model [J]. Brain Res, 2024, 1827(1): 148745-148754.
21
Sun X, Pan Y, Luo Y, et al. Naoxinqing tablet protects against cerebral ischemic/reperfusion injury by regulating AMPKα/NAMPT/SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway [J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2024, 322(1): 117672-117681.
22
Fang C, Huang L, Gu J, et al. Exosomal irisin from FNDC5-engineered BMSCs improves ischemic stroke via inhibiting YAP/EGR1/ACSL4-mediated ferroptosis [J]. Exp Neurol, 2025, 387(1): 115172-115181.
[1] 她娜, 翁雅伦, 张军. 弥散张量成像评估高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后运动功能障碍的疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 213-219.
[2] 李洋, 王宝军, 张天佑. 入院至静脉溶栓时间≤60 min对急性缺血性脑卒中预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 533-541.
[3] 陈勇, 彭淼, 裴月红, 黄骁, 张淦, 王文景, 杨琼. 《急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗技术中国专家共识2025》述评:迈向精准化与规范化[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 485-490.
[4] 于腾飞, 韩鹤泽, 王澄卓, 李佑祥, 王硕, 陈玉, 陈晓霖. 姑息性栓塞治疗成人脑动静脉畸形的长期临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 491-500.
[5] 张爽, 谢琦, 杨清武. 急性缺血性脑卒中无效再通的研究进展及脑保护新策略[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 351-358.
[6] 戴荣源, 裴月红, 孙庆利, 黄骁, 张淦, 樊东升, 傅瑜. 美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会《2026年急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南》更新概述[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 359-364.
[7] 曾陈颖, 陈云清, 徐祖兵, 余求龙, 林晶, 洪道俊, 涂琪. 炎症标志物在大梗死核心与非大梗死核心急性缺血性脑卒中行血管内治疗的预后价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 372-379.
[8] 魏宸铭, 牟婧宇, 赵心怡, 陈乐, 武剑. 不同评分量表对前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中诊断预测性能的差异[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 380-388.
[9] 康志霞, 班玉霞, 白如玉, 郝美美, 李正正, 苏琴琴. 血浆致动脉硬化指数和程序性细胞死亡因子4预测急性缺血性脑卒中神经功能缺损及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 389-395.
[10] 胡琼丹, 侯善兵, 陈霞, 王教媛, 戴晓熹. 应激性血糖升高比值预测急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 396-402.
[11] 陈苗苗, 张文田, 马宁. 颈内动脉穿刺法建立蛛网膜下腔出血模型[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 426-431.
[12] 穆巴拉克·伊力哈木, 纪蒙, 秦伟, 胡文立, 王朝东, 鲁明. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化分析甲状腺功能与缺血性脑卒中的因果关系[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 432-439.
[13] 周英, 李文雯, 周钰, 李炜, 贺思怡, 夏海艳, 王海玲. 基于临床医护人员视角的急性缺血性脑卒中患者就医延迟成因与对策的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 446-454.
[14] 黄开来, 李威, 赵振强. 依达拉奉右莰醇在急性缺血性脑卒中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 455-461.
[15] 李若曼, 王帆, 张涛. ASPECTS联合表观弥散系数对急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 403-410.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?